Talk:Soroavisaurus

GA review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Soroavisaurus/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Olmagon (talk · contribs) 23:33, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Jens Lallensack (talk · contribs) 14:59, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]


  • suggest to replace "referred" (which is technical jargon) with "assigned"
  • In 2002, Walker and Chiappe worked together on a study which – I think that "worked together on a study which" is unnecessary at best (just write "suggested that" instead). I think it is probably wrong, as this is a book chapter, and such books often take some years to get published, so they are unlikely to have worked on that particular study the same year the book came out.
  • cf. Martinavis – the "cf." should not be in italics.
  • More soon. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 14:59, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]