This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks.JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Martial arts. Please use these guidelines and suggestions to help improve this article. If you think something is missing, please help us improve them!Martial artsWikipedia:WikiProject Martial artsTemplate:WikiProject Martial artsMartial arts
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupations, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OccupationsWikipedia:WikiProject OccupationsTemplate:WikiProject OccupationsOccupations
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Some changes were made regarding "vagueness" with reference to the talk page. I actually don't understand it. The talk page, especially this discussion shows that there is some vagueness surrounding. The main part of the change was to remove "bushi" from the first sentence. There are several sources that say that bushi and samurai and used interchangeably in English, and that samurai is used to refer to every Japanese warrior. So now the lede doesn't match the article. I think this could be split into a bushi article and a samurai article. The Samurai article would mostly be about the Edo period Samurai and the Bushi article would be about Japanese warriors in general. The main difficulty I see in this, is that many sources treat samurai to mean Japanese warriors from the late Heian period onward, and not just warriors that were vassals. This is also the case for some Japanese sources. Does anyone know of another solution? DrGlef (talk) 15:21, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
3rd sentence of same section: move comma to be after 'that', edit Taira Kiyomori to Taira no Kiyomori, and link Taira no Kiyomori's page: "After that, Taira no Kiyomori practically controlled the court." Chyrion (talk) 10:55, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Under "invasion of Korea":
Change "In spite of the superiority of Japanese land forces," to "All reaching strategic stalemates on land,"
Change "The causes of the failure included Korean naval superiority (which, led by Admiral Yi Sun-sin, harassed Japanese supply lines continuously throughout the wars, resulting in supply shortages on land), the commitment of sizable Ming forces to Korea," to "The causes of the failure included the Korean-Chinese allied forces' naval superiority (which, led by Admiral Chen Lin and Yi Sun-sin, harassed Japanese supply lines continuously throughout the wars, resulting in supply shortages on land), the commitment of sizable Chinese forces armed with advanced artillery and professional cavalry to Korea,"
Change "During the second campaign in 1597, Korean and Ming forces proved far more resilient and with the support of continued Korean naval superiority, managed to limit Japanese gains to parts of southeastern Korea." to "During the second campaign in 1597, Korean and Chinese forces proved far more resilient and with the support of continued naval superiority of the allied fleets, managed to limit Japanese gains to parts of southeastern Korea." AnthonyRampart (talk) 05:46, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In the last paragraph of the introduction where the abolishment of the samurai during the Meiji Restoration is discussed, there is the statement "The samurai specialized in pre-gunpowder weapons that took years to master" when expanding on how modern firearms require less training and therefore commoners are able to be enlisted to use them when needed. This last point is clearly valid, but changing the wording of the quoted portion to exclude "pre-gunpowder" as samurai during the Sengoku and Edo periods specialized in multiple types of gunpowder weaponry - matchlocks, cannons, etc as primary weapons. Training and mastery of these weapons was required, and did not enjoy the ease of use that modern firearms do.
Therefore the proposed change is: "The samurai specialized in pre-gunpowder weapons that took years to master" to "The samurai specialized in weapons that took years to master". This small change early on in the page would help lessen further propagation of the incorrect understanding that samurai didn't use gunpowder weaponry as primary weaponry before the Bakumatsu period. 2001:1970:482B:4100:A3B6:A06F:3347:1FFC (talk) 01:37, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The samurai did use gunpowder weapons but so could peasants. When rifles came along, the traditionsl weapons became obsolete, which meant that the army could make do with peasant soldiers. Kurzon (talk) 04:56, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Szmenderowiecki (talk) 15:50, 21 June 2025 (UTC)