Talk:Russian destroyer Azard

Russian destroyer Azard has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 19, 2025. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Maritime / Russian & Soviet / World War I / World War II This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force World War I task force World War II task force Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. Soviet Union: Russia / Military Low‑importance Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Russia portal This article is supported by WikiProject Russia (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force.

GA review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Russian destroyer Azard/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 18:07, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 23:32, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Staking my claim to this one, review to follow in due course. Zawed (talk) 23:32, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't forget about this--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:49, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

• Reads fine

Design and description

• Inconsistency between text and infobox RE draught dimensions
  • Good catch

Construction and career

• Any info on namesakes for all three names the ship had during its career, may go towards explaning why the name was changed?
  • Annoyingly, no source really discusses the issue. OR tells me that the 1922 names were all of Bolshevik political figures and then they were changed to something more innocuous when they fell out of favor
• Inconsistency between text and infobox RE launch dates
• being employed on screening operations of the fleet,: should the 'of' be a 'for'?

References/Other stuff

• Sources look reliable, includes wellknown titles/authors
• No spot checks done of sources, happy to AGF given past reviews
• Image tag OK

That's all for now. Zawed (talk) 05:04, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, see if my changes are acceptable--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:44, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All good, passing as GA now. Zawed (talk) 07:40, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]