Talk:Ronald Reagan
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ronald Reagan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives (index): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
| The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, use the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
| Discussions on this page have often led to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting. |
| This It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Section sizes
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened:
|
Current consensus
[edit]
NOTE: It is recommended to link to this list in your edit summary when reverting, as:[[Talk:Ronald Reagan#Current consensus|current consensus]] item [n]
To ensure you are viewing the current list, you may wish to .
1. There is a consensus to call Ronald Reagan an American politician
instead of an American statesman
, in the first sentence of the lead section. (RfC December 2016)
In fact, some of Waffen-SS soldiers buried at Bitburg had been members of the 2nd SS Panzer Division, nicknamed "Das Reich," which had committed war crimes, although it has been estimated that none of the individual soldiers buried at Bitburg personally participated.(RfC April 2018) Since July 2020, the section no longer appears in the article.
3. There is a consensus to exclude Reagan's successful push for the United States Senate ratification of the Genocide Convention. (RfC July 2018)
4. There is a consensus to include in the Iran-Contra affair section, a very brief mention of the aspect of drug trafficking on the part of some Nicaraguan Contras. (RfC September 2019)
5. There is a consensus to add a subsection about Reagan addressing apartheid and a general consensus on the subsection's wording. (October 2019)
largely ignored the burgeoning AIDS crisis. (RfC April 2020)
7. There is no consensus to include in the lead section, a sentence, immediately preceding the ones on the Soviet Union, stating Reagan resisting calls for stringent sanctions against the apartheid regime in South Africa and vetoed a sanctions bill but was overridden by Congress
. (RfC April 2020)
9. There is a consensus that File:Official Portrait of President Reagan 1981.jpg should remain as the lead image. (RfC May 2021)
10. Supersedes #6. There is a consensus to include in the lead section, a clause about Reagan's response to the AIDS epidemic. There is no consensus to include a full sentence there, including Reagan also headed a delayed governmental response to the AIDS epidemic during his tenure
. (RfC May 2023)
Reverted 1 edit by KILLGOESE (talk): MOS also states, “retain U.S. in American or Canadian English articles in which it is already established, unless there is a good reason to change it.”
[edit]Is there any good reason to revert it back then?
@User:Drdpw KILLGOESE (talk) 21:17, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- @KILLGOESE Consistency. "U.S." appears throughout the article, but I found no uses of "US". —C.Fred (talk) 21:22, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- MOS:US says to use US not U.S. KILLGOESE (talk) 21:29, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- @KILLGOESE MOS also says exactly what you quoted in the section heading. What is the good reason to change it? —C.Fred (talk) 21:31, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- What does it say you mean? KILLGOESE (talk) 21:32, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- @KILLGOESE: You've restated the pertinent MOS phrase above, which was the good reason for the initial revert. Others have pointed this out to you as well on your talk page. Drdpw (talk) 21:34, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- Oh sorry, someone else reverted another article, i thought that was you, i didn't see this was about Ronald Reagan.
- My question is since i already changed it to "US" before i knew not to do that, why did you revert it back? What's the point of that? KILLGOESE (talk) 21:40, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- Why was it reverted back to U.S.? For the reasons stated above. Drdpw (talk) 21:49, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- above what? KILLGOESE (talk) 21:59, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- @KILLGOESE: You've restated the pertinent MOS phrase above, which was the good reason for the initial revert. Others have pointed this out to you as well on your talk page. Drdpw (talk) 21:34, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- What does it say you mean? KILLGOESE (talk) 21:32, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- @KILLGOESE MOS also says exactly what you quoted in the section heading. What is the good reason to change it? —C.Fred (talk) 21:31, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
- MOS:US says to use US not U.S. KILLGOESE (talk) 21:29, 26 November 2025 (UTC)





















