Talk:Ronald Reagan

    Featured articleRonald Reagan is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
    Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 6, 2008, and on June 11, 2024.
    In the newsOn this day... Article milestones
    DateProcessResult
    March 18, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
    March 6, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
    March 15, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
    April 6, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
    April 8, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
    April 12, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
    June 19, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
    July 16, 2007Good article nomineeListed
    July 31, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
    August 25, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
    July 31, 2008Featured article reviewKept
    May 21, 2009Featured article reviewKept
    In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on June 5, 2004.
    On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 12, 2004, June 5, 2005, January 2, 2014, January 2, 2018, and January 2, 2024.
    Current status: Featured article

    Current consensus

    [edit]

    NOTE: It is recommended to link to this list in your edit summary when reverting, as:
    [[Talk:Ronald Reagan#Current consensus|current consensus]] item [n]
    To ensure you are viewing the current list, you may wish to purge this page.

    1. There is a consensus to call Ronald Reagan an American politician instead of an American statesman, in the first sentence of the lead section. (RfC December 2016)

    2. Obsolete
    There is a consensus against adding the proposed text to the Honoring German war dead at Bitburg, Germany section: In fact, some of Waffen-SS soldiers buried at Bitburg had been members of the 2nd SS Panzer Division, nicknamed "Das Reich," which had committed war crimes, although it has been estimated that none of the individual soldiers buried at Bitburg personally participated. (RfC April 2018) Since July 2020, the section no longer appears in the article.

    3. There is a consensus to exclude Reagan's successful push for the United States Senate ratification of the Genocide Convention. (RfC July 2018)

    4. There is a consensus to include in the Iran-Contra affair section, a very brief mention of the aspect of drug trafficking on the part of some Nicaraguan Contras. (RfC September 2019)

    5. There is a consensus to add a subsection about Reagan addressing apartheid and a general consensus on the subsection's wording. (October 2019)

    6. Superseded by #10
    There is no consensus to include in the lead section, a clause in the sentence on Reagan's first term stating that during the said term, he largely ignored the burgeoning AIDS crisis. (RfC April 2020)

    7. There is no consensus to include in the lead section, a sentence, immediately preceding the ones on the Soviet Union, stating Reagan resisting calls for stringent sanctions against the apartheid regime in South Africa and vetoed a sanctions bill but was overridden by Congress. (RfC April 2020)

    8. Disputed
    Beginning in July 2019, there was a discussion about the integration of Reagan's remarks in a 1971 audio recording with Richard Nixon in the narrative of the body, but the closure and outcome is disputed. A similar discussion beginning in June 2020 was archived without closure or a clear consensus. Furthermore, there was not enough discussion on specific wordings or placements for a consensus to emerge on those matters. (February 2020, RfC June 2020)

    9. There is a consensus that File:Official Portrait of President Reagan 1981.jpg should remain as the lead image. (RfC May 2021)

    10. Supersedes #6. There is a consensus to include in the lead section, a clause about Reagan's response to the AIDS epidemic. There is no consensus to include a full sentence there, including Reagan also headed a delayed governmental response to the AIDS epidemic during his tenure. (RfC May 2023)

    Reverted 1 edit by KILLGOESE (talk): MOS also states, “retain U.S. in American or Canadian English articles in which it is already established, unless there is a good reason to change it.”

    [edit]

    Is there any good reason to revert it back then?

    @User:Drdpw KILLGOESE (talk) 21:17, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    @KILLGOESE Consistency. "U.S." appears throughout the article, but I found no uses of "US". —C.Fred (talk) 21:22, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    MOS:US says to use US not U.S. KILLGOESE (talk) 21:29, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @KILLGOESE MOS also says exactly what you quoted in the section heading. What is the good reason to change it? —C.Fred (talk) 21:31, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    What does it say you mean? KILLGOESE (talk) 21:32, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    @KILLGOESE: You've restated the pertinent MOS phrase above, which was the good reason for the initial revert. Others have pointed this out to you as well on your talk page. Drdpw (talk) 21:34, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Oh sorry, someone else reverted another article, i thought that was you, i didn't see this was about Ronald Reagan.
    My question is since i already changed it to "US" before i knew not to do that, why did you revert it back? What's the point of that? KILLGOESE (talk) 21:40, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    Why was it reverted back to U.S.? For the reasons stated above. Drdpw (talk) 21:49, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
    above what? KILLGOESE (talk) 21:59, 26 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]