This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Roland Bleyer is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
The sources all depict this guy as a perennial litigant and a bit of a dodgy dealer. He seems to be mostly notable for that reason, rather than the nature of his business itself. However, the article as it was created is pretty much a hagiography. I've started a section on legal issues to improve the neutrality. David Palmer//cloventt(talk)01:42, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A section on legal issues probably shouldn't be the long-term solution. Now there's indiscriminate positive coverage and indiscriminate negative coverage. I suggest we trim down any isolated events and put it all in chronological order. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸22:31, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]