Talk:Risk breakdown structure

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Business Mid‑importance Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Systems: Project management Mid‑importance Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is within the field of Project management. Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.

Copyedit summary

Edited in full. Confusing section marked (Risk_breakdown_structure#Templates_for_Creating_a_Risk_Breakdown_Structure) In this place, in particular, it seems that the content is copied or paraphrased from an instructional textbook. Paulmnguyen (talk) 01:36, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the section on Qualitative analysis, the two sentences beginning "At no point should the project manager or risk manager . . . " seem both to disrupt the flow of the article and to be more normative than descriptive. I'd suggest that these be moved to an advice article. SenexQuondam (talk) 18:06, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]