Talk:Relationship between science and religion

  1. Home
  2. Wiki

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - RPM SP 2022 - MASY1-GC 1260 200 Thu

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 February 2022 and 5 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Aashima99 (article contribs).

Wiki Education assignment: Honors World Religions

[edit]

This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2025 and 12 December 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Shadiagarcia (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Shadiagarcia (talk) 05:59, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion for additional section on Judaism

[edit]

Hello editors. I am Daniel Langton, a professor of Jewish history with interests in religion and science, and I’ve published on Jewish engagement with Darwinian evolution. I understand the COI guidelines and will not make direct edits to this page. However, I’d like to suggest the following for inclusion, if other editors agree it is relevant and meets reliable source and due weight criteria.

Judaism

[edit]

Jewish approaches to the relationship between science and religion have generally emphasized the complementarity rather than the opposition of faith and reason. Throughout history, rabbinic and philosophical traditions have treated the study of nature (maʿaseh bereshit) as a legitimate means of understanding divine wisdom. Before Darwin, Jewish tradition viewed creation as a purposeful, divinely ordered act rather than a random process. The world was understood as inherently good, revealing God’s wisdom through its harmony and lawfulness. Debate focused on why God created, not how—leaving natural processes open to philosophical and allegorical interpretation.[1] In the modern period, this orientation shaped Jewish responses to the emergence of modern science, and especially to Darwinian evolution, which became a touchstone for Jewish thought from the mid-nineteenth century onward.[2]

Early encounters with Darwinism

[edit]

When On the Origin of Species appeared in 1859, Jews across Europe and North America were already conversant with evolutionary ideas circulating before Darwin. The new theory’s emphasis on natural selection as an unguided mechanism of change nevertheless presented a profound theological challenge. Jewish commentators debated whether it undermined belief in providence, moral purpose, and human uniqueness, or whether it could be reconciled with biblical and rabbinic teachings.

Public discussions in venues such as The Jewish Chronicle revealed a broad spectrum of opinion. Some regarded evolution as compatible with a rational monotheism that could adapt to scientific discovery; others viewed it as morally corrosive “bad science leading to worse morality.” A number of writers sought middle ground, suggesting that the Torah taught why the world was created, while science explained how. The idea that Scripture and science occupied “two realms of teaching authority” became a recurring theme in Jewish thought.[3]

Among the first systematic attempts at reconciliation were those of the so-called enlightened traditionalists or maskilim. Naphtali Levy’s Toldot Adam (“The Origins of Man,” 1903), a Hebrew commentary on Darwin, proposed that the Torah’s account of creation could be read figuratively and that “no scientific truth, properly understood, will be in conflict with the teachings of the Torah, properly understood.”[4] Similarly, the Italian rabbi Vittorio Castiglioni, in Pe’er ha-Adam (“The Glory of Man,” 1892), argued that the Bible was not a scientific text and that evolution described the natural prehistory of humankind, while the soul and moral life originated through divine ensoulment.[5] Both men reflected a conviction that the study of nature revealed God’s laws operating within creation.[6]

Reform Judaism and moral evolution

[edit]

In the United States, the encounter with Darwin profoundly influenced the leaders of Reform Judaism. Rabbis Emil G. Hirsch, Joseph Krauskopf, and Kaufmann Kohler treated evolution as a universal principle applicable not only to biology but also to ethics, history, and religion. Their sermons and writings—bearing titles such as "Darwin and Darwinism" (The Reform Advocate, 1883), Evolution and Judaism (Philadelphia, 1887), and The Doctrine of Evolution and Judaism (1903)—presented creation as “the unfolding of the divine life” and humanity as the moral culmination of a natural process infused with divinity. For them, revelation itself was evolutionary: religious insight grew progressively through human experience. This identification of divine purpose with natural law became a hallmark of liberal Jewish theology and marked a shift from a transcendent to a more immanent conception of God.[7]

Mystical interpretations and Zionist thought

[edit]

Jewish mysticism provided another framework for interpreting evolution. The Italian kabbalist Elijah Benamozegh[8] regarded Darwin’s notion of common descent as confirmation of the Kabbalah’s vision of an emanating, living cosmos. In his synthesis of biblical commentary and modern science, evolution represented the gradual ascent of matter toward spirit, and nature itself was the visible manifestation of divinity. Later, the religious-Zionist thinker Abraham Isaac Kook[9] described evolution as “the ascent of all existence toward the Infinite.” For Kook, the creative energies observed by science were expressions of divine vitality unfolding within history; the building of the Jewish homeland was part of this same evolutionary process of redemption. Both figures articulated a form of panentheism—the belief that all things exist within God, who nevertheless transcends them—thus providing a theological bridge between traditional mysticism and modern scientific cosmology.[10]

Jewish philosophical and secular currents

[edit]

Parallel developments occurred in philosophy. Thinkers of Jewish background such as Henri Bergson in France (L’Évolution créatrice (1907)) and Samuel Alexander in Britain (Space, Time and Deity, vols. 1–2 (1920)) integrated evolutionary science into metaphysical systems that treated life and consciousness as emergent expressions of a creative, immanent reality. Bergson’s élan vital and Alexander’s “nisus” each portrayed divine energy as inherent within natural processes. Though secular in outlook, these philosophies echoed themes long present in Jewish speculation about an evolving universe permeated by spirit, and they anticipated later forms of process theology.[11]

Evolutionary anthropology and eugenics

[edit]

At the turn of the twentieth century, some Jewish intellectuals employed evolutionary reasoning to counter antisemitic racial theories. Lucien Wolf[12] argued that Jewish history demonstrated the moral and cultural evolution of humanity, while Joseph Jacobs[13] described the Jewish people as “a natural experiment” in adaptation to diverse environments. Other writers within the early Zionist movement interpreted nation-building in biological terms, seeing the return to the land as a regenerative stage in human development. Although later compromised by the association of eugenics with racial ideology, these efforts reflected a conviction that evolutionary science could illuminate the social mission of Israel.[14]

Evolution and post-Holocaust theology

[edit]

After the Second World War, evolutionary concepts continued to inform Jewish theology. Mordecai Kaplan, founder of Reconstructionist Judaism, described God as “the creative life of the universe,” a dynamic process rather than a supernatural person.[15] Hans Jonas developed a related vision of a “becoming God,” drawing moral lessons from biological evolution and the fragility of life.[16] Both thinkers used evolutionary cosmology to address the problem of evil and suffering, proposing that divinity acts not through intervention but through the ongoing emergence of order, value, and responsibility within nature.[17]

Overview

[edit]

Across these diverse contexts, Jewish engagement with science was rarely cast as a struggle between faith and reason. The dominant impulse was integrative: to reinterpret revelation in the light of empirical knowledge and to locate God within, rather than beyond, the natural order. Jewish engagement with evolutionary theory gave rise to a distinctively panentheistic theology—one that saw God as both immanent within and transcendent beyond the evolving cosmos. Rather than defending a transcendent Creator who guided evolution from without, many Jewish thinkers identified natural law itself as divine, allowing them to affirm both science and faith without recourse to supernatural intervention. This orientation drew upon deep currents in Jewish thought: the biblical and rabbinic emphasis on divine immanence within creation; kabbalistic notions of emanation and the sefirot, which envisaged all being as a gradation of divine life; and philosophical traditions from Maimonides to Spinoza, which encouraged naturalistic or rational readings of the divine. The relative absence in Judaism of doctrines such as original sin, together with its long-standing identification of study and inquiry as sacred acts, also made such integration intellectually and theologically feasible. By contrast with Christian theistic evolution, Jewish evolutionism tended to interpret the unfolding of life and morality as the self-expression of God through nature. This panentheistic tendency—evident from early on—constitutes Judaism’s distinctive contribution to the modern dialogue between science and religion—a vision of an evolving, divine universe.[18]

  1. ^ Daniel R. Langton, Darwin in the Jewish Imagination: Jews' Engagement with Evolutionary Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025), 281–290.
  2. ^ Ibid.
  3. ^ Ibid., 32–55.
  4. ^ Naphtali Levy, Toldot Adam (Warsaw: J. Lebensohn, 1874).
  5. ^ Vittorio Castiglioni, Pe’er ha-Adam (Venice: Tipografia del Commercio di Marco Visentini, 1892).
  6. ^ Langton, Darwin in the Jewish Imagination, 56–82.
  7. ^ Daniel R. Langton, Reform Judaism and Darwin: How Engaging with Evolutionary Theory Shaped American Jewish Religion (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2019).
  8. ^ Elijah Benamozegh, Israël et l’humanité, ed. Aimé Pallière (Paris: Alcan, 1914); trans. Maxwell Luria (New York: Paulist Press, 1995).
  9. ^ Abraham Isaac Kook, Orot ha-Kodesh, ed. David Cohen (Jerusalem: Mossad Harav Kook, 1985).
  10. ^ Langton, Darwin in the Jewish Imagination, 113–147.
  11. ^ Ibid., 148–183.
  12. ^ Lucien Wolf, “What Is Judaism? A Question of To-day,” Fortnightly Review (1884).
  13. ^ Joseph Jacobs, “On the Racial Characteristics of Modern Jews,” Journal of the Anthropological Institute (1885); Studies in Jewish Statistics (1891); Jewish Ideals and Other Essays (1896).
  14. ^ Langton, Darwin in the Jewish Imagination, 184–246.
  15. ^ Mordecai M. Kaplan, Judaism as a Civilization (1934); The Meaning of God in Modern Jewish Religion (1937); Judaism Without Supernaturalism (1958).
  16. ^ Hans Jonas, “The Concept of God After Auschwitz: A Jewish Voice,” in Mortality and Morality: A Search for the Good After Auschwitz, ed. Lawrence Vogel (Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1996).
  17. ^ Langton, Darwin in the Jewish Imagination, 249–273.
  18. ^ Ibid., 274–280.

Drlangton (talk) 08:50, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]