Talk:PDC Order of Merit

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Darts High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Darts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Darts-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Awards This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

ties

As ties happen regulary. There should be tie-breaker method. WHich one? -Koppapa (talk) 20:39, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

fake

Sir Alex Ferguson? On 2nd Place? Really? 131.220.49.206 (talk) 09:27, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

PDPA ranking - PDC Order of Merit

The PDPA page being referenced currently has a different ranking to the 19 March ranking. For example, Van den Bergh is 9th with Heta 10th. Ross Smith is 16th with Bunting 17th, Ratajski is 24th with Schindler 25th, Littler 26th, Dolan 27th, de Sousa 28th, Pietreczko 33rd, Kim Huybrechts 34th. Players Championship 7 and 8 from 2022 have been dropped from the rankings. JamesVilla44 (talk) 11:11, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Remove "First WDC Rankings" section?

I've done a bit of correcting, sourcing and tidying this article. The last thing on my list is the first WDC rankings section. It's a cool tidbit but I cannot find a source anywhere for it (including on the old internet-archived PDC website) and it may also be excessive detail - after all, there aren't OoM standings for any other time than now? I'm erring towards thinking it should be removed. PaisleyJesus (talk) 10:41, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]