Talk:On the Path to Revolution

On the Path to Revolution was nominated as a Art and architecture good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 14, 2025, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:On the Path to Revolution/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: AscendencyXXIV (talk · contribs) 22:52, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: History6042 (talk · contribs) 22:56, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I will do this one. History6042😊 (Contact me) 22:56, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

• Image is public domain and used appropriately. History6042😊 (Contact me) 22:59, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I fixed all prose and MOS issues I found. History6042😊 (Contact me) 23:54, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• The article is stable. History6042😊 (Contact me) 22:59, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Earwig found no copyvios. History6042😊 (Contact me) 23:03, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• The article is not stable because it refers to people in it as bigots. Unless the suppose to be from the previous line carries over which I am not sure it does. History6042😊 (Contact me) 23:03, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• The article is not broad because it says nothing about the location of the painting. It is however, focused. History6042😊 (Contact me) 23:03, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I will now spotcheck sources 1, 3, and 4. History6042😊 (Contact me) 23:48, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  They are all fine. History6042😊 (Contact me) 23:51, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  The article is also extremely short, please expand. History6042😊 (Contact me) 23:55, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I will check to see if I could expand the article, such as where and how it is preserved, but there's not much I can add beyond that - academic knowledge regarding the painting is quite narrow. AscendencyXXIV (talk) 02:42, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  @AscendencyXXIV, I am going to have to fail the article as it has been a week and you have not attempted to fix my concerns. History6042😊 (Contact me) 12:11, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Progress

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.