Talk:Omani ship Nasr al Bahr

	Omani ship Nasr al Bahr has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result December 28, 2024 Good article nominee Not listed May 28, 2025 Good article nominee Listed
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Maritime / Middle East This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force Middle Eastern military history task force Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

GA review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Omani ship Nasr al Bahr/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 19:50, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 22:54, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one. Parsecboy (talk) 22:54, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• File:Omani Naval Ship Nasr al Bahr and HMS Monmouth During Exercise Khanjar Ha'ad near Oman MOD 45153355.jpg - license checks out
• Had a look through the last 3 years' worth of Warship International in the hopes of finding any mentions of the ship's activity in the Naval Intelligence section, but no such luck. There may well be details in earlier issues, but I didn't have those immediately handy.
  • I know. I was pleased to have found the Stenberg article.
• Link knot and nautical miles in the box.
  • Done.
• "pendant number" or "pennant number"? Not sure I've heard the former term
  • Amended and linked. The former is used by Warlow & Bush in their title Pendant Numbers of the Royal Navy.
• The career section is a bit out of order - the 1995 refit is listed before the 1986 exercises, then we have events in 2011, and then back to 1990.
  • Reordered.
• One "Nasr al Bahr" missing italics in the construction and career section.
  • Fixed.

That's it for now. Parsecboy (talk) 23:05, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Parsecboy: Thank you. I believe these are now done. Please tell me if there is anything else. simongraham (talk) 13:30, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article is in good shape now - I'm happy to promote it. Nice work! Parsecboy (talk) 12:21, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]