This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Presidents of the United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Presidents of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Presidents of the United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject Presidents of the United StatesTemplate:WikiProject Presidents of the United StatesPresidents of the United States
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
How about a portrait page for every president since Richard Nixon. Like we just create pages dedicated to just Portraits of presidents. Starting with Joe Biden, Barack Obama, and George W. Bush. Fad8229 (talk) 04:43, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The reason why everything Trump is documented is because he's clearly more felt than any other politician in the US, I don't think I heard anything about Biden since Trump got in office apart from the fact he got cancer.
In any case, the portraits with their info should be split in their articles.
First presidency goes in the article about Trump's first presidency obviously, same logic for the others. the newer 2nd presidency portrait should also be mentioned in the page about his mugshot if it isn't already De Leonibus Emiliano (talk) 21:14, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Because of the multiple portraits and the analysis therein, it seems reasonable to retain this article. The real question should be about if other presidential portraits warrant their own entries. AlexanderMackle (talk) 15:46, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think it would be great to have a page for each. The analysis in this article was fascinating. I don’t doubt that photography experts and historians would have much to say about them all. Kackyoween (talk) 20:09, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]