Talk:October 7 attacks

This Wikipedia article quotes a figure of 36 children killed, but the reference given says 38.

[edit]

I haven't seen any explaination of this, so I'm going to presume it was an error and change the child death toll from 36 to 38 to match the figure in the reference (38 children were killed, 20 orphaned on Oct. 7: 'The state did not pass the test of protecting them' | The Times of Israel - 'According to data released by Israel National Council for the Child, 38 children were killed in Israel on October 7 during the Hamas-led terrorist onslaught.' - Times of Israel). If the actual child death toll is in fact 36, and not 38, please change it back and provide a reference to support the 36 figure. MathewMunro (talk) 04:59, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:52, 15 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request 2 September 2025 Change charges of "genocide" to "possible genocide"

[edit]

The citations for the genocide claim all say "possible genocide"

Change "According to several international law and genocide studies experts, Hamas' assault amounted to genocide.[58][59][60]"

to

"According to several international law and genocide studies experts, Hamas' assault possibly amounted to genocide.[59][60]" Remove source 58 as that source covers both Gaza and the Israeli response.


Diff:

"According to several international law and genocide studies experts, Hamas' assault amounted to genocide.[58][59][60]"
+
"According to several international law and genocide studies experts, Hamas' assault possibly amounted to genocide.[59][60]"

Mcdruid (talk) 23:25, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit extended-protected}} template. A potentially controversial change of this nature will require consensus first. I will note that the sources do not say "possible genocide": the letter the sources are reporting on refers to the attacks as "most probably constitut[ing] an international crime of genocide." Day Creature (talk) 12:23, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
At best, it should be "probable genocide" then. Note that ref 58 does not support that at all, and refs 59 and 60 refer to the same report. Mcdruid (talk) 21:08, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Source 58 literally says: "The massacres by Hamas constituted acts of genocide." - not probable genocide. Lova Falk (talk) 14:51, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 23 September 2025

[edit]

Background section: Israel unilaterally withdrew from the Gaza Strip in 2005. While they control the borders and airspace, they are not actively occupying Gaza. Sources: https://www.britannica.com/event/Israels-disengagement-from-Gaza, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_disengagement_from_the_Gaza_Strip, https://www.un.org/unispal/history/ GallopingSheep9 (talk) 18:35, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Quoting the template, "the request must be of the form "please change X to Y"." --Yamla (talk) 19:49, 23 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed removal of possible propaganda site

[edit]

I propose to remove the link to saturday-october-seven.com on the bottom of the page as it seems to be part of a propaganda campaign by Netanyahu.

See these articles for context:

Laura240406 (talk) 18:49, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done M.Bitton (talk) 19:09, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing here indicates that it is a propaganda site, just that Netanyahu is encouraging people to open the link and see the atrocities. The link has been there for a year a half and it should be restored. Nehushtani (talk) 06:06, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The Jerusalem Post article I linked clearly states: The QR code is part of a broader Israeli public-diplomacy push in New York this week. Dozens of billboard trucks and digital screens near the UN headquarters.
Also, the site is also just a gore site that hosts material that is very likely a copyright violation as it hosts videos produced by Hamas fighters on October 7th.
The New York times article I linked states: Some of the images and videos on the website appear to have been taken by attackers during the Oct. 7 assault.
WP:COPYVIOEL states: If there is reason to believe that a website has a copy of a work in violation of its copyright, do not link to it
Linking to the site would be along the lines of linking to an "October 7th" category on LiveLeak. Laura240406 (talk) 07:06, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]