Talk:National Audit on Group-based Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Misrepresented data
[edit]The report mentions that two thirds of the reported cases omitted ethnicities of perpetrators. This fact should be included in the article due to the fact that the lack of such a discrepancy will skew the fullness and the factual content of the article. 87.55.134.213 (talk) 20:14, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Please provide reliable secondary sources. 46.97.170.26 (talk) 14:32, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
- Page 8 of this report into Child sexual abuse from the National Police Chiefs Council says as follows:
- "All ethnicity data in this report relates to the individual’s self-defined ethnicity. This is the most detailed data relating to ethnicity that is recorded by police. Completion rates of ethnicity data is particularly low, with 35% (n = 37,584) of victim ethnicity and 31% (n = 37,755) of perpetrator ethnicity recorded in the current dataset."
- https://www.vkpp.org.uk/assets/Totality-year-2-report-National-Analysis-of-Police-Recorded-CSAE-Crimes-Report-2023_compressed.pdf Rootless Co$mopolitan (talk) 23:28, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- We are not qualified to evaluate this information. Any conclusion that you draw from it is original research and has no place on Wikipedia. 46.97.170.26 (talk) 18:57, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
- What do you mean? are you suggesting, no one on wikipedia can take data stated in an official source and use it? What a ridiculous argument Rootless Co$mopolitan (talk) 13:32, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
- We are not qualified to evaluate this information. Any conclusion that you draw from it is original research and has no place on Wikipedia. 46.97.170.26 (talk) 18:57, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
topics to expand the article;
[edit]In this chapter, we discuss three of these factors, which we have touched on in previous chapters and which we believe have been significant. They are: i) the ethnicity of perpetrators; ii) iii) the adultification of child victims; and lack of accountability.
--
As the report itself identifies these three areas.
Expansion might want to consider what RS sources (inc the report itself) says about all three issues. LeChatiliers Pupper (talk) 20:09, 20 June 2025 (UTC)