Talk:Multilayered packaging


reviewer 1

[edit]

The article provides well-structured overview of multilayer packaging technologies, from industrial production techniques to sustainability and end-of-life challenges. It effectively combines technical depth with clarity. Minor improvements in grammar and punctuation would enhance the overall readability. Strong points include the clear categorization of processes and relevant examples of emerging recycling and biodegradable systems. Some abbreviations need to be spelled out the first time, and adding hyperlinks to key terms would help readers. Helena Teresa (talk) 13:33, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer 3

[edit]

The article is well-organized and easy to read, with a clear structure and smooth flow. Overall, it’s informative and nicely illustrated. Great job! Roca9999 (talk) 13:34, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer 2

[edit]

The article is well-written and structured, providing a comprehensive coverage of the definition, history, types, manufacturing methods, and end-of-life aspects of multilayer packaging. The sections are well-supported with up-to-date citations, and the use of images effectively illustrates key concepts such as multilayer cartons, co-extrusion, and lamination processes. However, some technical simplification would help make the content more accessible to non-technical readers.EcoINV-PPP (talk) 15:37, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process

[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Referencing is wrong, and significant peacock.

Ldm1954 (talk) 02:48, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]