Talk:Modafinil
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Modafinil article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 6 months ![]() |
![]() | Modafinil is currently a Biology and medicine good article nominee. Nominated by Maxim Masiutin (talk) at 21:24, 23 December 2024 (UTC) Any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.) Short description: Eugeroic medication |
![]() | Modafinil was nominated as a Natural sciences good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (February 13, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Statistical Significance
[edit]I refer to the statement “ Modafinil has been shown to have minor and barely statistically significant effectiveness in managing fatigue in people with MS”; in basic statistical analysis where a p value is predetermined by the researcher to account for the probability that their results are unlikely due to chance, the results can either be “statistically significant “ or not. Even if the p value generated is very close to the the predetermined probability value, this has no meaning whatsoever, because we’re working with probability values or p values based on a normal curve. The error in this article is find sometimes in other scholarly articles I read or asked to review for blind peer reviewed journals; which is something like “ the results where almost statistically significant “ or “ the results approach statistical significance “. These statements are also examples of misinterpretation and or misunderstanding of parametric statistics.
Therefore I strongly recommend that the article be updated to improve scholarly rigour. If no one has raises an objection or needs clarification, or makes the amendment, I will undertake to do this myself.
Dr.khatmando (talk) 14:04, 10 May 2025 (UTC) Dr. Jason M Dixon Advanced psychometrics, epidemiology, clinical educator. Editorial Board, WikiJournal of Medicine
- Yes, that sentence and its paragraph were poorly written and sourced, and were removed with 3 edits in Special:Diff/1289788786. Zefr (talk) 21:24, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Good oh! After looking at the cited references, and the results, discussion of these related to MS, did not add value to the article itself.
- Your edits make for a better read. Thanks for your attention to the matter. Cheers Dr. J Dr.khatmando (talk) 21:43, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Special:Diff/1289787389 shows the removal; Special:Diff/1289788786 doesn't.
- I don't agree that there's anything inherently wrong with the "the results approach statistical significance" or "barely statistically significant effectiveness" language.
- I say that "because we’re working with probability values or p values based on a normal curve" is not a compelling argument.
- I object to the removal on that basis.
- The "often report" language is certainly not compatible with scholarly rigor. Flagging / Removing. Looking at the widely used review, cite_note-pmid38988104-42, the effectiveness in managing fatigue in PWMS is poor and it directly contradicts the unsourced "without causing drowsiness or disrupting nighttime sleep" claim in the paragraph. Flagging / Removing. Figures 1-5 (all the forest plots) show that across all metrics, most of the individual studies did not find statistically significant effectiveness in managing fatigue in PWMS. Many of the results favored control over Modafonil. RememberOrwell (talk) 21:57, 24 August 2025 (UTC)