Talk:Luke Lloyd

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Sports and Games Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation. Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance). Australia: Australian rules football Low‑importance Australia portal Luke Lloyd is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Australian rules football (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^What's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

AI generated template explanation

Hi -- I added the AI-generated template here; other similar contributions by the article's creator in the same time period (i.e., not their 2020 stuff) display many signs of AI use, and while this article is less obvious in that regard, common sense suggests that it needs scrutiny as well, especially since it's a BLP. Gnomingstuff (talk) 14:11, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]