Talk:List of Intel processors

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of Intel processors article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Electronics Mid‑importance Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk page Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Computing Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Technology Technology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

	Archives: 1, 2
This page has archives. Sections older than 100 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors: [[Itanium#Itanium 2: 2002–2010|McKinley]] The anchor (#Itanium 2: 2002–2010) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before. [[Itanium#Itanium 2: 2002–2010|Madison]] The anchor (#Itanium 2: 2002–2010) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before. [[Itanium#Itanium 2: 2002–2010|Montecito]] The anchor (#Itanium 2: 2002–2010) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before. [[Itanium#Itanium 2: 2002–2010|Montvale]] The anchor (#Itanium 2: 2002–2010) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before. [[Intel Graphics Technology#Integrated|UHD 770]] The anchor (Integrated) has been deleted. [[Intel Graphics Technology#Integrated|UHD 730]] The anchor (Integrated) has been deleted. [[Intel Graphics Technology#Integrated|UHD 710]] The anchor (Integrated) has been deleted. [[Intel Graphics Technology#Integrated|UHD 750]] The anchor (Integrated) has been deleted. The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error

80186

It should be noted here that despite everyone saying it was only available as embedded systems, there were still lots of desktop systems (like the siemens pc-d I have in my cellar). it was available with a 80187 fpu and a revolutionary bus system that allowed up to 127 extension cards.. if your case was big enough... and then later I got some 14mb hard drive... ah, those were the times... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.176.232.207 (talk) 19:11, September 10, 2006

"Built-in multitasking" ?

I removed this completely nonsensical statement. It was perhaps the intention that some reference be made to support for _virtual memory_, so it's fair to say "had built-in support for multitasking o/s's that require vm".

One multitasking feature that requires hardware support in CPUs is the ability of the outside bus or memory connection of each CPU package to coordinate access to the same memory bytes by 2 or more CPU packages in the same computer (such as in a computer with two 80386 CPUs or one with two multicore Xeon CPUs). It is this hardware feature which allows multitasking operating system kernels to reliably run code on more than one CPU at the same time. CPU models without this feature cannot be used in motherboards with room for more than one CPU, but will have the feature internally between their cores or hyperthreads (if any). Jbohmdk (talk) 23:43, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

IXP?

Shouldn't the Intel IXP product line be listed?

Proposed extension of the tables at the top

The top of the article presents the important information as convenient tables. But then the article descends into reams of artistically phrased text that is not so easily navigated. This is a simple suggestion to expand the tables at the top with the information from the bottom as follows:

• In the headline above each of the similar tables, put the numeric generation before the code name, e.g. "12th gen Core Mobile, codenamed Alder Lake" instead of "Mobile - codenamed Alder Lake (12th gen)".
• Between each headline and table, insert other facts salvaged from the bottom of the article.
• Add a column with transistor count and node size (e.g. "3.1 million (800nm)" for the original P5 Pentium 60MHz with FDIV flaw), noting that this may vary between individual models in a generation.
• Do include the workstation/server models in each generation, not just the consumer models, or add a specific note in the additional facts if no such model was shipped in that generation.

Jbohmdk (talk) 00:27, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Missing N100

The N100 is a processor in succession of the Celeron line. https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/sku/231803/intel-processor-n100-6m-cache-up-to-3-40-ghz/specifications.html

It is nowhere to be found on Wikipedia. This list really should contain it.

Dominik Hoffmann (talk) 15:24, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]