Talk:Kansas Citizens for Science

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Creationism: Intelligent design Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Creationism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Creationism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Intelligent design task force (assessed as Low-importance). This article has been marked as needing immediate attention. Kansas Low‑importance Kansas portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Kansas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Organizations This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Science Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Misc

Recently cleaned up the article and improved flow.

Neutrality

This article needs to be reworded to be more neutral. Phrases such as "secretly collaborated with" and "correct the standards the creationists had passed" indicate a left-leaning viewpoint. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.47.25.98 (talk) 02:58, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I made a few changes along those lines. There does seem to be a lot of press coverage of this group, so seems to be notable. Sources could be added to the article. Jaque Hammer (talk) 12:50, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The phrase "secretly collaborated with" is factual. Saying "correct the standards the creationists had passed" is a proper statement, since the creationist content of the science standards was not scientific. Liz Craig, Charter Member of Kansas Citizens For Science 72.128.27.92 (talk) 18:09, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]