This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request
This page is related to a topic subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.)
Administrators may disregard the above message.
You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If administrator}}. You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page:
The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
All participants in formal discussions (RfCs, RMs, etc) within the area of conflict are urged to keep their comments concise, and are limited to 1,000 words per discussion. Citations and quotations (whether from sources, Wikipedia articles, Wikipedia discussions, or elsewhere) do not count toward the word limit.
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours (except in limited circumstances)
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Description of suggested change:
Add both sides to the criticism section.
Kasher and Yadlin explain clearly their decision to rank the protection of soldiers over the protection of foreign non-combatants in 'Military Ethics of Fighting Terror: An Israeli Perspective' (https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570510014642).
These issues are discussed in the linked paper, and should be mentioned to provide a balanced and neutral perspective on the subject.
Diff:
−
In fact, Khalidi points out that Kasher and Yaldin stated they "reject the common conception of noncombatants having preference over combatants" in their 2005 paper Military Ethics of Fighting Terror: An Israeli Perspective.[8][9]
+
In fact, Khalidi points out that Kasher and Yaldin stated they "reject the common conception of noncombatants having preference over combatants" in their 2005 paper Military Ethics of Fighting Terror: An Israeli Perspective. Kasher and Yadlin justify this decision in their paper. It outlines clearly that the hierarchy of priorities they institute is the direct result of the local terror doctrine of using human shields to protect military assets/personnel, and explain the implication that if a soldier is forced to protect an enemy non-combatant it would make responding to the terror threat impossible and only further incentivise the use of human shields. An additional implication is that if a soldier is legally mandated to endanger themself in order to protect a foreign non-combatant, used as a human shield, the terror group can actually attack the local non-combatants directly, and the soldiers in the area would be required to endanger themselves to save them.
Not done for now: I suggest a discussion establishes a consensus as to potential issues of WP:UNDUE, WP:POV and WP:BALANCE before adding the material. —Fortuna, imperatrix11:34, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]