Talk:Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Merger proposal

[edit]

HP Enterprise Business page should not be merged into this article as a) it is significantly out of date - HP Enterprise Business became HP Enterprise Group more than three years ago b) HP Enterprise Group is just one of four major business units to make up Hewlett Packard Enterprise.

Agreed: In Hewlett Packard Enterprise, the Enterprise Group is one element of the company with three other areas, Enterprise Services, Software and Financial Services. Enterprise Group should be referred to in the new Hewlett Packard Enterprise page, including the four main areas of Enterprise Group. The old HP Enterprise Business page is out of date. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.149.182.123 (talk) 18:14, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest HP Enterprise Business be appropriately updated and linked to from Hewlett Packard Enterprise — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.1.197.37 (talkcontribs)

I do not think the HP Enterprise Business and Hewlett Packard Enterprise articles are strong enough to warrant two different entries. --Svgalbertian (talk) 14:32, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed. The former unit wasn't particularly independently notable in the first place and didn't really need a separate article to start with. Perpetuating the unneeded split is ill advised. oknazevad (talk) 19:37, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Additionally, that article on the former unit, in addition to being well out of date, reads like its part of the corporate website. Seriously, it fails NPOV in every way. oknazevad (talk) 19:39, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Soft oppose it as the new company is an independent legal entity and though they do largely overlap of what this company used to be it's not the same entity, I think that this article should be expanded on more as it evolves, but the HP Enterprise Business refers to older business of a now defunct company, compare Motorola Vs. Motorola Mobility Vs. Motorola Solutions.
Sincerely, --86.81.201.94 (talk) 20:45, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar and Punctuation

[edit]

I would also suggest that the grammar and punctuation errors in the piece be corrected. It's embarrassing..... 14:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)104.129.204.85 (talk)

Proposed merge with HP Atalla

[edit]

This product is not independently notable, and so should be merged and redirected; see WP:PRODUCT. If that is not suitable, it should go to AfD. FalconK (talk) 19:59, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merge; a better target, following the 2016 spinout, might be Micro Focus. Klbrain (talk) 20:36, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Closing, given no support and, it seems, development independent of Micro Focus too (see this edit). Klbrain (talk) 16:56, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Editors should please note that this page refers to the company created by the split of the original Hewlett-Packard on Nov 1, 2015, and should ONLY be linked to from other articles if the context refers to events AFTER the split. Any references to HP prior to the split should be linked directly to Hewlett-Packard. I would appreciate if editors could go through all the pages that link to here and HP Inc. and correct those that reference events before Nov 1, 2015: see here for an example of what I would like to be done. Thanks for your help, <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 22:49, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 February 2018

[edit]

Change "Hewlett Packard Labs – the research & development arm of HP Inc." to "Hewlett Packard Labs – the research & development arm of HPE. 15.203.233.87 (talk) 18:07, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. There is still an HP Inc. so there needs to be a reliable source clarifying whether HP Labs is a subsidiary of HP Inc. or HPE. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:31, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Done BrandonXLF (t@lk) 18:00, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft entry for Antonio Neri

[edit]

Hi, I'm Andrada and I work for Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE). I've made an account to suggest improvements to articles related to the company. I've saved a draft entry for the President and CEO at Draft:Antonio Neri (businessman). I'm looking for editors who can review and move the draft, presumably to Antonio Neri (businessman) since there's already a page for Antonio Neri. Thank you. AMorar HPE (talk) 19:13, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"HP Enterprise"

[edit]

It strikes me that the "Naming" section is incorrect - "HP Enterprise" is a valid abbreviation of the name. Eilidhmax (talk) 23:52, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Eilidhmax: It's not clear if the articles are calling the company "HP Enterprise" or if they're using it an an abbreviation, so I reworded the section.BrandonXLF (t@lk) 23:03, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Correction and update for Acquisitions table

[edit]

Hello again, Andrada here on behalf of Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) (as disclosed above: I am an employee of the company and here in an official capacity). I noticed the Acquisitions table is outdated.

  1. The BlueData acquisition was announced on November 27, 2018, but closed on December 18, 2018, per this Forbes source. This CRN article also confirms the November announcement and December close.
  2. The Cray acquisition closed on September 25, 2019, per this source and this source.

I'm trying to get the article updated, but I won't be editing directly because of my conflict of interest. Can someone please review and update the page for me? Thank you. AMorar HPE (talk) 02:17, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Guy Harris and Mikepegg: I see you've both updated this article before, including changes to the Acquisitions table. Are you available to review this update request? Thank you. AMorar HPE (talk) 22:32, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@BrandonXLF: Hello. I'm trying to get the Acquisitions table updated, and saw you helped with an edit request above. Might you be able to help here as well? I'd update the page myself but I have a conflict of interest, so I'm asking other editors to make updates on my behalf. Thank you. AMorar HPE (talk) 18:22, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply 24-OCT-2019

[edit]
  • If the listed date is incorrect — for example, it says May 15 when it should say March 15 — then this can be considered an error in grammar, since the correct spelling of March is M-A-R-C-H and not M-A-Y. This simple type of fix is permissable for you to make on your own, per WP:COIU.
Regards,  Spintendo  09:29, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply 26-OCT-2019

[edit]
  •  Done (I don't know why we're using headings for replies, but here we are.) @AMorar HPE: I completed both the edits and added some of the sources to the article. For the second one it was clearly a spelling mistake and you should have been able to do it yourself, but better safe than sorry.BrandonXLF (t@lk) 22:39, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. Thanks to User:BrandonXLF for replying above and updating the article. Upon further thought, I think there's a better way to make the article more complete, informative, and helpful to readers, and less redundant. Currently some of HPE's acquisitions and divestitures are mentioned in the 'History' section, then there's a somewhat redundant 'Acquisitions' section and table further down. I propose creating an 'Acquisitions and divestitures' subsection within the 'History' section, and removing the duplicate 'Acquisitions' section/table. I've proposed subsection text below for editors to review, which describes:

  • (1) how some of HPE's subsidiaries were formed by HP acquisitions
  • (2) HPE's purchases and divestitures as a standalone company, with correct dates, dollar amounts, and the impacts had within HPE or the industry as a whole
  • (3) other intellectual property acquired by HPE

The proposed section includes a simpler table of acquisitions to help readers at a glance. This is intended to replicate the current Acquisitions table with less detail.

Text removals in 'History'

[edit]

If the proposed sub-section were added, some text could be removed from the current 'History' section to eliminate redundancy, including:

How to preview proposed changes

[edit]

Here's the best way to review my proposed edits:

  • (1) copy the markup for the 'Acquisitions and divestitures' sub-section proposed above, and paste within current 'History'
  • (2) remove the 7 pieces of red-colored text in the 'History' section bulleted above
  • (3) remove the current (duplicate) 'Acquisitions' section and table, then click on "Show preview"


I know I'm suggesting substantial changes here, but my goals are to make the article more accurate and complete, eliminate redundancy, and improve flow by grouping all acquisition and divestitures text within a single sub-section, rather than being scattered throughout the company's general history and then being duplicated in a table further down. I'm trying to get the article updated, but I won't be editing directly because of my conflict of interest. @BrandonXLF: Can you or another editor please review and update the page for me? I'm happy to discuss further or answer questions. Thanks! AMorar HPE (talk) 22:17, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hewlett Packard

[edit]

is about the enterprise-focused company that was spun off from Hewlett-Packard and used for technology. 105.1.228.32 (talk) 23:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hewlett-Packard is about the company, founded in 1939, that was split into HP Inc. and Hewlett Packard Enterprise (after other parts, including the instrumentation part that was the original business of Hewlett-Packard, were already spun off). The page Hewlett Packard Enterprise, for which this is the talk page, is about the latter company. Hewlett Packard redirects to Hewlett-Packard, as it should. Guy Harris (talk) 08:05, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]