Talk:Female perversion

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of crime and criminal biography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Psychology Low‑importance Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.

There is no cited mention of opposing ideas or responses to this paper these are needed for balance --Nate 11:20, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article was written by a single individual, relying on a single source that is not recognized as a standard reference in the literature. In addition, the supporting sources would appear, at quick glance to be POV and agenda driven themselves. DashaKat 12:59, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

just to clarify I agree with the tag & was adding part of the reason --Nate 13:49, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now, I understand. Good faith. So, let's get to work! DashaKat 16:30, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]