Talk:Eating Out 2: Sloppy Seconds

This article is a current featured article candidate. A featured article should exemplify Wikipedia's best work, and is therefore expected to meet the criteria. Please feel free to leave comments. After one of the FAC coordinators promotes the article or archives the nomination, a bot will update the nomination page and article talk page. Do not manually update the {{Article history}} template when the FAC closes.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Eating Out 2: Sloppy Seconds article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: https://www.google.de/books/edition/Women_in_Relationships_with_Bisexual_Men/wDa6CwAAQBAJ https://www.out.com/movies/2016/9/21/happy-birthday-these-15-underrated-comedies (review) https://eds-p-ebscohost-com.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/eds/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=69505a8b-ac18-4e70-9a81-73690e98d87b%40redis&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWRzLWxpdmUmc2NvcGU9c2l0ZQ%3d%3d#AN=23296813&db=f6h (interview)

	Eating Out 2: Sloppy Seconds has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result September 28, 2024 Good article nominee Listed February 22, 2025 Peer review Reviewed
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 26, 2024. The text of the entry was: Did you know = ... that the director of Eating Out 2: Sloppy Seconds once described the film as "gaysploitation"?
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film: American Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines. This article is supported by the American cinema task force. LGBTQ+ studies LGBTQ portal This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.

Forst Gay Sequel

I have deleted a comment debating the honesty of the film's billing as the "first gay sequel" for two reasons: 1) It veers way to far into POV category; 2) Neither Basic Instinct nor the Brotherhood series are specifically gay (although the Brotherhood series features hunky guys traipsing around in boxer briefs and homoeroticism in plenty).THD3 02:58, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]