Talk:Deacon

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Deacon article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 years

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Christianity: Eastern O. / Anglicanism / Methodism / Latter Day Saints High‑importance Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Top-importance). This article is supported by Methodism work group (assessed as Low-importance). Latter Day Saints portal This article is supported by WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement (assessed as Low-importance).

The content of Transitional deacon was merged into Deacon on 11 August 2016. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

Awards

Hi, @Pisarz12345: please note that you have violated the three-revert rule in adding the section "Awards" to the article. There are some significant issues with this addition. The initial addition was unreferenced, apparently plagiarizing content from this website. Since that original addition, citations to appropriate references have been added, but in the section heading itself rather than alongside the content the references support (see WP:CITEFOOT: "Citations should not be placed within, or on the same line as, section headings"). Additionally, there are commas where they don't belong. Perhaps most glaringly, there is no purpose for this contextless list, as the same material is already covered sufficiently several paragraphs earlier. I recommend that Pisarz12345 remove the 3RR violation containing the MOS issues and redundancy. Do feel free to append the citation to the patriarchia.ru source to the end of the paragraph beginning "Diaconal vestments are the sticharion", though, as that paragraph is currently unreferenced. ~ Pbritti (talk) 01:28, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]