Talk:Dan (volume)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China Low‑importance China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Japan Low‑importance Japan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Japan to do list: edit history watch purge Peer review: None A-class review: None Featured content candidates –  Articles: None Pictures: None Lists: None Good article nominations: Add requested images to articles that need them. Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions. Improve and expand Japan-related stubs. Create some requested articles. Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English. Assess unassessed articles Korea Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To not merge, the differences being sufficient to warrant separate discussion; a merge would be confusing for readers. Klbrain (talk) 14:59, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

Propose merging koku (the older article, for the Japanese version of the unit) into this article. They're not sufficiently differentiated for separate articles. seefooddiet (talk) 21:30, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose. The topics are distinct even if there are some parallels. Merging these articles would also likely make this topic more confusing for readers. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 21:48, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oppose and move to close. they certainly are distinct enough, and have had very different political histories.--Plifal (talk) 00:31, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.