This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Canada: Law Low‑importance Canada portal WikiProject Canada Canada notice board This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian law.

The content of Voluntary trades was merged into Compulsory trade on 24 March 2018. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

Each term only makes sense when contrasted to the other; the article on voluntary trades has more information about compulsory trades than about voluntary trades. PamD 21:36, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Support I agree -- the term compulsory trades makes for at least the beginnings of a stub article. The term voluntary trades could essentially be boiled down to "everything else". WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:15, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Support for both reasons above. Little Will (talk) 17:15, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Support, I don't see a need to separate the subjects into two articles. PKT(alk) 16:39, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Klbrain (talk) 21:13, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]