Talk:Claude (language model)

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Artificial Intelligence This article is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Technology Technology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Companies Low‑importance Companies portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Linguistics: Applied Linguistics Low‑importance Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force. Robotics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Computing: Software Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software. Transhumanism High‑importance Claude (language model)' is part of WikiProject Transhumanism, which aims to organize, expand, clean up, and guide Transhumanism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page for more details. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. For more information and how you can help click Show: If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page for more details. Quick help: Main talk page Article layout Links to Transhumanism information and Wikipedia:Research resources Writing about religion and Article development Citing sources, Verifying sources and Original research Assume good faith and be civil See changes to: Core articles Transhumanism article New Transhumanism articles To Do List: edit - history - watch - purge Join WikiProject transhumanism and be bold Show off a userbox with {{userWPA}} or {{userWPA2}} and attract potential members Help with articles. See this month's adopt an article. Help out with the To-do lists Be consistent Use a "standard" layout for transhumanism related articles (see: The perfect article, and Featured articles) Add Transhumanism navigation template on the bottom of all transhumanism articles; (use {{Transhumanism}} or see navigation template) Add Transhumanism info box to all transhumanism related talk pages (use {{Wpa}} or see info box) Add [[Category:transhumanism]] to the bottom of all transhumanism related articles, so it shows up on the list of transhumanism articles Maintenance / Etc Find/cite sources for all positions of an article (see citing sources. Try to expand stubs, however, some "new" articles may be neologisms, as this is common with positions on theories on life and may be suitable for deletion (see deletion process) Watch the list of transhumanism related articles and add to accordingly (see transhumanism articles) And always write for an encyclopedia. Create Notable transhumanist articles Shorten / merge into others Expand a transhumanism stub Your immediate attention false choice into false dilemma - discuss whether you are for or against this merge here Clarify references in Transhumanism, using footnotes.

Should we split the article into different pages for each major version

? Mr Vili talk 01:24, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think Claude is sufficiently popular for now to justify separate articles. Unless there is a very significant media coverage in Claude 3 or future models, I would say no, keep it in one article. Alenoach (talk) 18:45, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I think Claude 3 will have significant coverage compared to past models, but we'll give it some time to see Mr Vili talk 04:44, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template

I suggest removing the template "Machine learning" ("Part of a series on Machine learning and data mining"). It looks too generic to me. But it's ok if you want to keep it. Alenoach (talk) 18:50, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, Claude does not appear in the series on machine learning, which is by the way primarily about machine learning techniques, not about products based on machine learning. So I removed it. Alenoach (talk) 00:35, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

not in all regions available

claude is not available in all regions. 195.34.152.36 (talk) 13:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Claude-3.5 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:51, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saying “AI” in opening

Wondering if a layman would understand the opening section. Can we mention it’s an AI tool? I think people would grasp it easier if we made that more explicit in the opening. PacificPenman (talk) 15:06, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Undue sentence?

I don't think this sentence saying that the Claude logo looks like an anus is warranted. The sourcing is not that strong. One source is from the New Scientist, but it just briefly mentions Claude among other chatbots. Another one is from a personal website, and the remaining one a YouTube video; all three are not specifically about Claude. I have not seen other significant sources about this on the internet. This is significantly less media coverage than when a new Claude feature comes out. Alenoach (talk) 21:19, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see where you're coming from, but I've seen a significant amount of references to it outside of the cited sources. It's interesting what you say about news coverage, because I had barely even heard of Claude before I came upon this story. –DMartin 05:23, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The only article that I have seen covering the topic that isn't self-published is the one from New Scientist, which briefly mentions Claude alongside other chatbots. Do you have another source to propose? Alenoach (talk) 16:19, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looking around, I can see quite a few people discussing both in the blogosphere and on social media. I don't think it's necessary to cite every single one. In looking at WP:Humour it says " When a humorous work on a subject has attracted enough attention to be verifiable in reliable sources, it can be appropriate to reference that work on the page." I feel like this qualifies. –DMartin 18:36, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this is important enough for an RfC, but I'd be interested to see what some other editors think, as we both seem like we won't be convinced. –DMartin 18:38, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, a RFC seems overkill. I propose requesting a third opinion on that page: WP:THIRD. Alenoach (talk) 21:56, 26 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea(I didn't even know that was a thing). I've posted it there. `–DMartin 05:56, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Response to third opinion request:

Most sources I can find attribute this as an overall trend in AI company logos, listing Claude as just an example. Likely undue for this article, however may be due in an article about AI as a whole. Coleisforeditor (talk) 14:20, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]