Talk:California Legislative Jewish Caucus

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Organizations Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics: American Low‑importance Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance). Jewish culture Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. California Low‑importance California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

NPOV and editorializing

I have tagged this article as having NPOV issues and essay-like writing. It includes a large array of positions that aren't supported by citations, but are original writing / framing. Even the section headings, such as "Historic allocation surge" describe facts cited to the press releases of the caucus, but not what any reliable source like a news story describes as a surge in allocation of funds. That kind of novel editorial interpretation is not allowed on Wikipedia. Steven Walling • talk 02:07, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]