Talk:Boundary parallel

Unclear lead - wrong links?

[edit]

The text In mathematics, a closed n-manifold N embedded in an (n + 1)-manifold M is boundary parallel (or ∂-parallel, or peripheral) if there is an isotopy of N onto a boundary component of M. is unclear for several reasons:

I considered In mathematics, a closed n-manifold N embedded in an (n + 1)-manifold with boundary M is boundary parallel (or ∂-parallel, or peripheral) if there is an isotopy of N onto a component of M's boundary., but that seems stilted and doesn't address the second issue.

How about In mathematics, an embedding of a closed n-manifold N in an (n + 1)-manifold with boundary M is boundary parallel (or ∂-parallel, or peripheral) if there is an embedding of N onto a component C of M's boundary and f is isotopic to g.

Is the concept of components of the boundary of a manifold with boundary important enough to warrant a section or anchor somewhere? Note that boundary component links to the wrong definition and probably should be a DAB page. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 08:23, 12 June 2025 (UTC) -- Revised 13:12, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unless someone objects I'll go with In mathematics, an embedding of a closed n-manifold N in an (n + 1)-manifold with boundary M is boundary parallel (or ∂-parallel, or peripheral) if there is an embedding of N onto a component C of M's boundary and f is isotopic to g. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 14:19, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]