Talk:Amazon-class frigate (1795)

	Amazon-class frigate (1795) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
	Amazon-class frigate (1795) is the main article in the Amazon-class frigates (1795) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones Date Process Result July 30, 2024 Good article nominee Listed August 14, 2024 Good topic candidate Promoted
Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Maritime / British / European / Napoleonic era This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force British military history task force European military history task force Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815) Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Amazon-class frigate (1795)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Ykraps (talk · contribs) 19:09, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 00:11, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:11, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Sturmvogel 66:, Are you still hoping to return to this? Regards --Ykraps (talk) 10:47, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Images appropriately licensed
• being sank in an action on 13 January Bad grammar and this isn't quite right as she was wrecked after having broken off the engagement. Don't name Droits de Homme in the lede, just that she was a ship of the line.

  Changed to "...wrecked following an action on 13 January with a French ship-of-the-line". --Ykraps (talk) 19:27, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• The lede's too short add something about the prizes taken by the ships or something.

  Extended. See what you think. --Ykraps (talk) 19:27, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  The earlier Amazon's are really only background info for these ships. So I'd recommend deleting the stuff you added to the lede about them and substituting info about the ships captured by the quartet.

  Okay, I have removed and added a bit more about service, including some notable engagements. --Ykraps (talk) 19:39, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• 18 pounders hyphenate this as it's a compound adjective modifying long gun and drop the terminal "s".

  Done. --Ykraps (talk) 19:27, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Spell out 9 pdr with a link, spell out 32 pdr as well

  Done. --Ykraps (talk) 19:27, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Explain the subsitution of 12 pounders for 9 pounders shown in the infobox

  Added to main text. --Ykraps (talk) 19:51, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Do you know when this happened? Otherwise looks good thus far.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:03, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes, after the second pair were ordered. Now added. --Ykraps (talk) 19:39, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Don't see any real need to detail the third design as Naiad suffices

  Removed. --Ykraps (talk) 19:51, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• The Amazon section is too short; add something about the privateers that she captured.

  Added captures and mpre detail about her engagement with Droits de l'Homme. See what you think. --Ykraps (talk) 19:39, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Explain what Santisima Trinidad was and why it was significant

  Done. --Ykraps (talk) 19:39, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• What rank was Samuel Hood?

  He was a full admiral at the time. Added. --Ykraps (talk) 19:39, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Link naval architect, captain

  Done. --Ykraps (talk) 20:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• You only need to give the city for the publisher's location

  Done. --Ykraps (talk) 20:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• The ISBN for James Vol. II is for the reprint. Format it just like Vol. III.

  Done. --Ykraps (talk) 20:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Add an OCLC # for the Indian Forester

  Done. --Ykraps (talk) 20:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• You've got several different styles of footnotes, I suggest that you standardize on one.

  Done. --Ykraps (talk) 20:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Don't forget to italicize the ship names in the new para you added to the lede. I'm going to promote now regardless.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:17, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Done thanks and thanks for the review. --Ykraps (talk) 20:31, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]