This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Corruption, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CorruptionWikipedia:WikiProject CorruptionTemplate:WikiProject CorruptionCorruption
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture
The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a contentious topic. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
[[Poisoning of Alexei Navalny#Return and imprisonment|returned to Russia]] The anchor (Return and imprisonment) has been deleted.
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links.
Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Under Alexei Navalny's "Political positions" under "Ukraine", the statement about his view on the East Slavic States should be re-added either directly or rephrased to convey the same message that he may sometimes support Ukraine and sometimes show extreme nationalist sentiments:
"In early 2012, Navalny stated on Ukrainian TV, "Russian foreign policy should be maximally directed at integration with Ukraine and Belarus… In fact, we are one nation. We should enhance integration". During the same broadcast Navalny said "No one wants to make an attempt to limit Ukraine's sovereignty"
Here are the sources that were listed previously:
Krzysztof Nieczypor (25 February 2012). "Ukraine in "Big-Time Politics" of Alexey Navalny". Eastbook.eu. Archived from the original on 15 March 2014.
"Navalny: Integration with Belarus – Main Task for Russia". Telegraf.by. 13 February 2012. Archived from the original on 28 September 2013.
For the links, just go to the previous versions from this winter or maybe even spring.
Overall, it seems quite dishonest to omit these previously stated quotes from Wikipedia to paint Navalny as anything other than quite ultranationalistic. MaximillionMax (talk) 20:49, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure that this belongs to the Early Life section, or anywhere else in the article. It's well known that Navalny's father is an ethnic Ukrainian, so Navalny couldn't have possibly used the word Banderites referring to all Ukrainians as a slur (which would imply that there were no Ukrainians in his family). He's using it in the regular sense "my family is from Ukraine but they weren't supporters of OUN/Bandera". Alaexis¿question?23:15, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I do not see any policy which prohibits mentioning RSFSR. The postal address would contain district, oblast, republic, and the country. Ymblanter (talk) 20:49, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It is unnecessary to display Russian SFSR, Soviet Union. For example, it is not necessary to state: New York City, New York, United States when New York City, U.S. conveys essentially the same information more concisely. On the other hand, specifying a small town such as Butyn and omitting Moscow Oblast is wrong, because it forces the reader to follow the link for the town that they might not know. Absolutiva (talk) 03:16, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I do not think it makes sense to include the second-level subdivision but not the first-level one. This might imply that Moscow Oblast is the first-level subdivision. I am also not sure how Russian SFSR (or any other republic) would be unnecessary, it is not like this is redundant. A case where it could be argued that it is redundant is if we mentioned the administrative center e.g. "Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk Oblast" or "Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk Krai". Mellk (talk) 21:49, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]