Talk:Aima Baig

Aima Baig is currently a Music good article nominee. Nominated by M. Billoo at 01:18, 2 December 2025 (UTC) Any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and then save the page. See the good article instructions. Short description: Pakistani singer (born 1995)

This article was nominated for deletion on May 23, 2016. The result of the discussion was delete.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Musicians Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation. This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance). Pakistan Low‑importance Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women in Music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. The entire article relates to the following contentious topics: Living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles The region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator.

Coke Studio table

Hi! Some anonymous user has several times merged the Coke Studio table into soundtrack table, giving the reason that CS is just a TV series and irrelevant to promote here on BLP with separate table. Maybe, that anonymous didn't note that it worths to mention every suitable parameter for a song of a singer, and that is what CS does. It is more than a TV series for a singer. And this BLP is of a singer. So, discography tables with all suitable information worth.

That is not what only I am saying. See this edit by other user, after which the page was protected due to disruptive edits. Still, after protection ended, the anonymous re-edited on their "own thinking". See this edit by me also. Like, we cannot update the discographies as in WP:DISCOGS because of lack of that kind of references, but we can update as per those references that we have. Thanks! M. Billoo 03:28, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 13 September 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In aima baig's singles you did not add aik qaum aur aik manzil and na cher malanga nu to the already released items. 51.36.66.17 (talk) 18:34, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. - FlightTime (open channel) 18:36, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Green 20-minute assessment

Thanks for participating in Women in Green! Taking a general look at this article, I notice a few places where a copyedit for more idiomatic phrasing would be beneficial (e.g., she is no more able to move her right hand middle finger, She has been a subject for her resemblance with Ariana Grande, whom she is inspired with); it's persistent enough that it might be good to see if the Guild of Copy Editors could give it a once-over. Organizationally, the bit about cancer philanthropy probably belongs better in "personal life". I also wonder if the list of covers is really WP:DUE.Finally, it looks like some of the songs in the soundtrack tables are uncited; I'm not fully familiar with the sourcing expectations for discographies but you might want to double-check them. Looking over the reference list in general, I see a lot of YouTube citations (generally unreliable) but they seem to just be cited to the songs, which strikes me as OK; I don't spot any other sourcing red flags. So overall, I wouldn't nominate it for GA just yet, but these things look addressable and it could be nominated soon. Happy editing! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 02:20, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@LEvalyn: Hi! Thank you for the feedback. I have reworked a little now. Although, the competition has ended (sadly, I could not participate), a new feedback, however, would be appreciated. M. Billoo 11:26, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, you've been busy! It's much improved. There are still ways it could be polished I think, but all of the "possible quickfail" problems have been addressed and you could consider nominating it for GA. I'm glad you gave Women in Green a try regardless of how it turned out! If you'd like an alternative way to potentially get a faster GA review, you might look into GA review pledges. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 06:13, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]