Talk:Adversarial Design

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy: Aesthetics / Social and political / Contemporary Low‑importance Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Aesthetics Social and political philosophy Contemporary philosophy

Requested move 19 July 2025

Adversarial Design → Adversarial Design (book) – It is unclear to me that the concept of "Adversarial Design" meets notability criteria, since almost all sources I can find on internet are either primary sources, or reviews of the book by DiSalvo. The book itself, however, seems notable, therefore I propose refocusing this article on the book rather than the concept. If the community agree, I can restructure the page to make it more focused on the book 7804j (talk) 17:54, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Not disagreeing in spirit, but opposing rename: The content of the article can be modified as suggested without changing the article's title. The current article title is the title of the book, and renaming it to Adversarial Design (book) would be WP:Unnecessary disambiguation. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 18:52, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  That's a good point, thanks! I agree with this proposal. I will then withdraw my requested move and just proceed with the adjustment of the content 7804j (talk) 18:59, 19 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]