Talk:Adenosine triphosphate

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Adenosine triphosphate article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months

	Adenosine triphosphate was one of the Natural sciences good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result January 1, 2007 Good article nominee Listed September 7, 2009 Good article reassessment Kept March 26, 2018 Good article reassessment Delisted
Current status: Delisted good article

This  level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Molecular Biology: Genetics / MCB / Cell Signaling High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of molecular biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as High-importance). This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Top-importance). This article is within the scope of the Cell Signaling task force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive. Chemicals High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Neuroscience Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neuroscience on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Physiology High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. This article has been classified as relating to the physiology of the respiratory system.

This article was the MCB Collaboration of the Month for the month of October 2006. For more details, see the MCB Collaboration of the Month history.

Archives

Index 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be auto-archived by ClueBot III if there are more than 2.

50kg or body weight?

One section of the article claims that an adult human uses 50kg of ATP per day. Another part of this article (under the "Recycling" heading) says approximately their body weight per day. Which one is it? Mythmon (talk) 17:44, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Found in all known forms of life..."

How far does that go? Does it include Viruses? MarkMLl (talk) 13:43, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

yes Frogmug (talk) 17:28, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]