Talk:Addiction

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 January 2022 and 17 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Friedchickenprincess (article contribs).

split mechanisms section

[edit]

request to split mechanisms section into Mechanisms of addiction page to aid in reducing length which is 9611 words Cognsci (talk) 18:35, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
Addiction is a vast area of study and a great deal of research is emerging and expanding the topic further. I would support the move to restructure the information so that ‘mechanism of addiction’ is given more focus in a separate page. I would also advocate allocating a specific section to the psychological aspects of addiction. This is mainly to better accommodate the psychosocial and experiential factors which are associated with an increased risk of addiction. I feel that this is of some relevance given that individuals maybe be looking for information concerning themselfs or family members. Thanks DharmSophia (talk) 10:40, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
this article already has a risk factors section, though if you want to include info about how rather than whether addiction is related to these "psychological aspects of addiction" then sure Cognsci (talk) 12:49, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support – The mechanism section is too long, I agree. I believe it would be better to name the new article ”Mechanism of addiction", rather than making mechanism plural. The fact that there are multiple mechanisms should be mentioned in the article, rather than implied by the title. This is similar to the mechanism of autism article. The mechanism section here should be a summary of the new article. Slothwizard (talk) 21:34, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: The readable, text-only size for that section is 9707 bytes, or 1376 words. In any event, because (1) addiction is a neuropsychiatric disorder that involves ongoing, aberrant changes to neural networks that govern reward salience and action selection/decision making, and (2) there is no separate "pathophysiology" section on this article, I would expect the mechanisms section to take up a decent fraction of the article size. That said, I would support WP:SPLIT in this case if the section were to be much bigger than it currently is. E.g., epigenetics of cocaine addiction is it's own article simply because the field of epigenetics is very, very complex, which is why Addiction#Neuroepigenetic_mechanisms is relatively brief and offers supplementary hyperlinks to neuroepigenetics et al. Professional Crastination (talk) 07:31, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Mechanism of addiction is an interesting approach to the topic, but also perhaps a very needed one. Denoting this in the singular is also an interesting choice, but is perhaps less warranted. While working directly in the field of treatment for the past 10 years, I have come to know addiction as BOTH, a physiological and a pathological phenomenon. It is my belief that the observance of any potential "mechanism" of addiction would certainly fall short were it to not include references to both of these aspects. 2603:7080:100:1F7A:5849:4341:FD1B:6913 (talk) 03:49, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Re:I have come to know addiction as BOTH, a physiological and a pathological phenomenon
I just want to clarify so I can understand your point better - what do you mean by addiction being physiological? When I read physiological, my first interpretation is that you're describing addiction as a normal/non-pathological process in the body. So, I assume I'm misinterpreting. Professional Crastination (talk) 06:57, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request to replace commercial sources

[edit]

I request that the following three citations be replaced with government sources per WP:RS and WP:MEDRS.

The existing source AddictionCenter.com is operated by a for-profit marketing company that promotes specific treatment facilities and sells inbound calls to those facilities. As such, it presents a conflict of interest and is not considered a neutral, evidence-based source.

1. Replace AddictionCenter.com with: "Key Substance Use and Mental Health Indicators in the United States: Results from the 2021 National Survey on Drug Use and Health". Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2022. Retrieved 31 August 2025.

2. Replace DualDiagnosis.org with: "Mental Health and Substance Use Co-Occurring Disorders". Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Retrieved 31 August 2025.

3. Replace DrugAbuse.com with: "Principles of Drug Addiction Treatment: A Research-Based Guide (Third Edition)". National Institute on Drug Abuse. January 2018. Retrieved 31 August 2025.

These replacements use neutral, government-published, peer-reviewed sources in line with Wikipedia’s medical sourcing policy. Trustagent2025 (talk) 04:03, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Behavioral Neuroscience

[edit]

This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 September 2025 and 12 December 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Oboukalik (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Oboukalik (talk) 03:05, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Brain Disorder Model

[edit]

Are we sure its the most appropriate to format the page around the idea that addiction is a brain disorder when it is a highly contested model? Its quite controversial to present it as an absolute truth when there's emerging evidence on the contrary.

I suggest its better we make the definition more neutral in the introduction (i.e. focus on behaviours rather than the possible cause of addiction such as the referencing how its compulsive or something similar to that) and delve into the brain disorder model under a subsection. Textbookviolence (talk) 16:24, 30 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]