| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Comments left by AfC reviewers
[edit]
Comment: Looks notable based on a quick search, but the entire article is based on two sources that don't help with establishing that. C F A 💬 18:45, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
Comment: Additional sources that might help with notability - [1] [2]. looks like nvidia also are on this - [3] Mdann52 (talk) 05:08, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
This article reads like very lightly massaged LLM output
[edit]Which I suppose is no surprise given the topic, but it does suck to see this kind of prose in mainspace. Haven't verified any citations (no access to sources), but both books cited do exist with the bibliographic information presented in the article, and it wouldn't surprise me if the cites checked out, as nothing extraordinary is claimed. Folly Mox (talk) 13:49, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
- This article is absolutely terrible and would need many hours of work to fix, unless it is simply totally deleted. Is there a template that can be added to the top that says it's absolutely terrible? Why is there an infobox for a private company that is not actually the subject of the article? SharkJumperNYC (talk) 17:53, 11 November 2025 (UTC)
