Talk:2024 Indian general election
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2024 Indian general election article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. | 
| 
 
 Article policies
 | 
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL | 
| Archives (index): 1Auto-archiving period: 4 days  | 
|  | Warning: active arbitration remediesThe contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a contentious topic. The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article: 
 Restrictions placed: 4 June 2024Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. | 
|  | This page is not a forum for general discussion about 2024 Indian general election. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about 2024 Indian general election at the Reference desk. | 
|  | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. | 
|  | This article was nominated for deletion on 25 May 2019. The result of the discussion was keep. | 
|  | A news item involving 2024 Indian general election was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 10 June 2024. |  | 
|  | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 
 
 
 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|  | This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2024, when it received 18,499,431 views. | 
|  | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 10 times. The weeks in which this happened: | 
|  | It is requested that one or more video files  be included in this article to improve its quality. | 
|  | It is requested that one or more audio files be included in this article to improve its quality. Please see Wikipedia:Requested recordings for more on this request. | 
ਭਾਸ਼ਾ
[edit]ਇਹ ਸਾਰਾ ਡੇਟਾ ਜੋ ਕਿ ਹੋਰ ਭਾਸ਼ਾਵਾ ਵਿੱਚ ਉਪਲੱਬਧ ਹੈ ਕਿਰਪਾ ਕਰਕੇ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਵੀ ਉਪਲੱਬਧ ਕੀਤਾ ਜਾਵੇ । ਆਪ ਜੀ ਦਾ ਧੰਨਵਾਦ 59.98.199.59 (talk) 08:36, 27 January 2025 (UTC)
- ਸਤਿ ਸ੍ਰੀ ਅਕਾਲ। ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਵਿਕੀਪੀਡੀਆ ਦਾ ਲਿੰਕ ਇਹ ਰਿਹਾ। ਇਹ ਅੰਗਰੇਜ਼ੀ ਵਿਕੀਪੀਡੀਆ ਜਿੰਨਾ ਵਿਸਤ੍ਰਿਤ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੈ।. pa.wikipedia.org 24.153.57.64 (talk) 16:21, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 April 2025
[edit]|  | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered=parameter to no to reactivate your request. | 
Kindly fix the grammar in the Misinformation section from: An alleged doctored video of BJP leader Amit Shah’s speech regarding reservations in Telangana on April 23 was posted by Telangana Congress on their social media platform X (formerly Twitter), where Amit Shah was wrongly shown to be announcing the curtailment of reservations granted to the SC, ST, & OBC communities.[206] Amit Shah accused the opposition of tampering with his video, leading to the registration of an FIR and a summons being issued to Telangana's Chief Minister Revanth Reddy.[207] The police arrested two people, one from the Congress party, and another from the opposition Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) in connection with Shah's case.[208] The arrested Congress worker was associated with its social media unit, and was alleged to have created Shah's fake video.[209][210] The Congress Party denied the involvement of its worker in this case.[211]
to:
An alleged doctored video of BJP leader Amit Shah’s speech regarding reservations in Telangana on April 23 was posted by Telangana Congress on the social media platform X (formerly Twitter), where Amit Shah was wrongly shown to be announcing the curtailment of reservations granted to the SC, ST, & OBC communities.[206] Amit Shah accused the opposition of tampering with his video, leading to the registration of an FIR and a summons being issued to Telangana's Chief Minister Revanth Reddy.[207] The police arrested two people, one from the Congress party, and another from the opposition Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) in connection with Shah's case.[208] The arrested Congress worker was associated with its social media unit, and was alleged to have created Shah's fake video.[209][210] The Congress Party denied the involvement of its worker in this case.[211] Atharva210 (talk) 11:30, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
Minor grammar correction.
[edit]Please add a comma after "Purnia" in the second paragraph in the Aftermath section. Purnia is a place and the words after that are the name of an independent MP. Neel st (talk) 09:39, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 24 October 2025
[edit]|  | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered=parameter to no to reactivate your request. | 
103.74.91.225 (talk) 13:20, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
Add Rahul Gandhi as party face for congress instead of kharge ji
 Not done: Gandhi was not yet the leader of INC at the time of the election. Day Creature (talk) 14:43, 24 October 2025 (UTC) Not done: Gandhi was not yet the leader of INC at the time of the election. Day Creature (talk) 14:43, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
Removed private survey findings from official results section
[edit]Somebody added this in the results section. I have removed it as the findings are from sample surveys by private agencies and therefore have not much relevance in official elections results declared by Election Commission of India.
Education-level analysis
It shows significant outliers. The INDIA Block dominates among illiterate voters with 49.6% of the vote share, compared to the NDA’s 36.4%, resulting in a -13.2% deficit for the NDA. This reflects the INDIA Block's resonance with economically and socially marginalized groups. In contrast, the NDA has a clear advantage among voters with higher education. Professionals strongly favor the NDA, which leads with 44.4% against the INDIA Block’s 30.6%, marking its largest demographic advantage of 13.8%. Similarly, the NDA enjoys an 11.5% lead among post-graduates. These trends highlight the NDA’s appeal among more affluent, urban, and educated voters.
At intermediate education levels, such as high school and higher secondary, the competition is closer. The NDA leads by 1.5% and 4%, respectively, in these segments. Among voters with non-formal education, the NDA also maintains a 4.1% lead. Overall, the INDIA Block’s strength among illiterate voters contrasts sharply with the NDA’s dominance among the highly educated and professionals. Coupled with its narrow gender gap, the INDIA Block has an opportunity to further mobilize less-educated voters, while the NDA’s focus on urban and educated demographics could shape its electoral strategy.[1][2][3][4]





