Talk:2021 in classical music

This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Lists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Years This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Sociology Low‑importance Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. History Low‑importance History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Media Low‑importance Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Media To-do List: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite NPOV : Content (media and publishing) Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper Other : Answer requests for comments Classical music Classical music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.

Alphabetize new compositions

Organize all compositions in the order of composers' family names. Tgkohn (talk) 21:30, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Revise lists to emphasize composer

Almost all entries of music with text --both in the New works list and the New opera list-- now use a format of

[Composer name] (music) and [Librettist name] (text) - [Wok name][citation]

This format raises the importance of the librettist, which some might hold is an equal artistic role. (I do not disagree with the important artistic contributions of the librettist, by the way.) However, these lists are of the musical product, and, as such, making the function of the librettist to be equivalent to the composer is mistaken. A less-desired side effect is that the full product of the composer during this year may become separated into each work with libretto and a group of instrumental compositions.

I suggest the revision of entries with text to use the format

[Composer name] - [Work name] ([Librettist name], text)[citation]

This revised format maintains the unity of listing works by the compser, and it still allows full recognition of the contributing librettist. Tgkohn (talk) 20:51, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My response is, as with the 2022 in classical music, 2023 in classical music, and 2025 in classical music pages: No. As stated there, it is not a 'mistake' in any way to equate the contributions of the composer and text writer in a vocal work, or the composer and the librettist in an opera. In both cases, one cannot have the one without the other. As well, the current format for each is the clearest and least cluttered. In my opinion, the proposed layout serves no purpose and is unnecessarily confusing and serves no purpose.