Talk:2020 Israel–Palestine peace plan

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2020 Israel–Palestine peace plan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}} You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning { display: none; } Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.)

Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a contentious topic. The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article: All participants in formal discussions (RfCs, RMs, etc) within the area of conflict are urged to keep their comments concise, and are limited to 1,000 words per discussion. Citations and quotations (whether from sources, Wikipedia articles, Wikipedia discussions, or elsewhere) do not count toward the word limit. You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive) You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours (except in limited circumstances) Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator.

This page is subject to the extended confirmed restriction related to the Arab-Israeli conflict.

WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS The article 2020 Israel–Palestine peace plan, along with other pages relating to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are: Limit of one revert in 24 hours: This article is under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24-hour period) Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned. Remedy instructions and exemptions Enforcement procedures: Violations of any restrictions (excluding 1RR/reverting violations) and other conduct issues should be reported to the administrators' incidents noticeboard. Violations of revert restrictions should be reported to the administrators' edit warring noticeboard. Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense. An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned. With respect to any reverting restrictions: Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion. Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism. Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction. Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!

This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination. Discussions: Moved to 2020 Trump Israel–Palestine plan, 15 February 2025, from Trump peace plan to ?, see discussion. Moved to 2020 Israel–Palestine peace plan, 4 October 2025, from 2020 Trump Israel–Palestine plan to Donald Trump's 2020 Israel–Palestine plan, see discussion.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Arab world High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. International relations: Law High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject International law. Israel High‑importance Israel portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Project Israel To Do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Assess : Rate the Unassessed Israel-related articles and Unknown-importance Israel-related articles. Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category and the tool's wiki page. Collaborate : Participate in WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration. Copyedit : Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in 2005 Deletion sorting : Participate in discussions at WikiProject Deletion sorting/Israel. Expand : Ayala Procaccia, Diamond industry in Israel, Edna Arbel, Levin Kipnis, Rami Kleinstein, Sephardic Haredim, Zman Tel Aviv, Nachum Heiman, Public Defence (Israel), Prisoner of Zion, Trial of Benjamin Netanyahu, Day to Mark the Departure and Expulsion of Jews from the Arab Countries and Iran, Pre-Modern Aliyah See also Articles needing translation from Hebrew Wikipedia. Geographical coordinates : Add geographic coordinates to Israel articles missing geocoordinate data. Infobox : Add infoboxes to Israel articles needing infoboxes. Maintain : See Israel articles needing attention. Map : See discussion at Module:Location map/data/Israel. Add maps to articles in Wikipedia requested maps in Israel. NPOV : Jewish exodus from Arab and Muslim countries Photo : Add pictures to articles in Wikipedia requested photographs in Israel. Stubs : See Israel stubs. Update : Basic Law proposal: Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People Other : Translate to Hebrew : David Bar-Hayim, Guy Bavli, and Guy Oseary. Military history: Middle East / North America / United States / Post-Cold War Start‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions. Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met Associated task forces: /  Middle Eastern military history task force North American military history task force United States military history task force Post-Cold War task force Palestine High‑importance Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Politics: American Mid‑importance Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance). United States: Government / History Mid‑importance United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history (assessed as Mid-importance). Conservatism High‑importance Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Presidents of the United States: Donald Trump High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Presidents of the United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Presidents of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. This article is supported by the Donald Trump task force.

Reviving prospects?

If Trump wins again? Anything on this? 82.36.70.45 (talk) 15:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 5 February 2024

This edit request to Trump peace plan has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Specify "François" Dubuisson. The name appears out of nowhere. The footnote (28) helps but the text could be more explicit. 173.2.228.243 (talk) 21:58, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I've also added it a second time in the "Status of Jerusalem, Palestinian capital and Holy Sites", since it is quite far away from the first occurrence. Liu1126 (talk) 23:17, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 May 2024

This edit request to Trump peace plan has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

https://www.timesofisrael.com/peace-plan-booster-greenblatt-to-quit-white-house-after-proposal-released/ This article is linked as a source in the section titled "United States policy changes and development of the plan." After reading the source (and the paragraph which cites it), it's clear that the following sentence:

In the Palestinian view, Friedman, throughout his two years of engagement, acted as Israel's spokesman, a country he would never criticize, while he would frequently lambast the Palestinian side on his Twitter account.

Should be changed to:

In the Palestinian view, Greenblatt, throughout his two years of engagement, acted as Israel's spokesman, a country he would never criticize, while he would frequently lambast the Palestinian side on his Twitter account. Dmh17 (talk) 22:47, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Liu1126 (talk) 21:25, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 February 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Sophisticatedevening ^(talk) 21:22, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

Trump peace plan → ? – I looked up "Trump peace plan" on Google. Almost all results right now are about Ukraine. This title is too vague. Super Ψ Dro 12:57, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The only other title which fulfills WP:NATDIS is probably "Peace to Prosperity." Otherwise, something like "Trump peace plan (2020)" ―Howard • 🌽³³ 20:37, 15 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Donald Trump Israel–Palestine peace plan of 2020? —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 02:08, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Donald Trump Israel–Palestine peace plan is precise and sounds like a typical Wikipedia title. I think I support this one. Super Ψ Dro 16:05, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that seems good. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 22:59, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Support change of name, say, to "Trump's Gaza peace plan". This change of name is now all the more necessary, as there is another Trump peace plan, namely, Trump's Russian-Ukraine peace plan.Davidbena (talk) 02:39, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This article isn't about Trump's 2025 plan for Gaza, which is covered at Potential American ownership of the Gaza Strip, but his 2020 plan involving both Gaza and the West Bank. — Goszei (talk) 22:17, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Support 2020 Donald Trump Israel–Palestine peace plan, per Super Dro 2020 Trump Israel–Palestine plan, per VR. It has all the elements needed for disambiguation. — Goszei (talk) 22:13, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Support the title 2020 Trump Israel–Palestine plan. The "Donald" and "peace" parts are unnecessary and the latter part is also controversial[1] and therefore a WP:POVNAME. Also "peace" is an WP:OVERPRECISION, as there was only one plan that Trump proposed for Israel-Palestine in 2020.VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 13:12, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

"Trump peace plan" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Trump peace plan has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 February 23 § Trump peace plan until a consensus is reached. GnocchiFan (talk) 12:24, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request 27 September 2025

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Description of suggested change: The original text falsely equates the rejection of the plan by Palestinian leadership, and the so-called 'rejection' by Yesha Council. Yesha Council is an umbrella organization of municipal councils, akin to a Political Action Conference in America. It is in no position to 'reject' or 'accept' any proposal. As a body lacking authority to make any decision on the matter, Yesha Council's reaction to the plan can be accuratley described as criticism. The use of the term 'rejection' is not factually correct. Even if one were to find the use of the word 'rejection' reasonable in some contexts, by describing Yesha Council's reaction to the plan as a 'rejection', while also talking about Palestinian leadership's 'rejection' of the plan in the same sentence , the text equates both reactions. This equation is factually inaccurate since Palestinian leadership is in a position to consider, negotiate, accept or reject such plans - whereas Yesha Council is in no position to take any such actions.

The suggested edit addresses this issue by relabeling Yesha Council's reaction to the proposal as 'criticism', and uses language that better explains the impact of both Yesha Council's and Palestinian leadership's reactions to the proposal.

Diff:

−

Both the West Bank settlers' Yesha Council[3] and the Palestinian leadership rejected the plan, the former because it envisaged a Palestinian state,[3] and the latter arguing that it was too biased in favor of Israel.

+

Palestinian leadership rejected the plan, arguing it was too biased in favor of Israel. The plan was also met with criticism in Israel, namely by the West Bank settlers' Yesha Council[3], because of their opposition to the plan's envisaging of a Palestinian state[3].

2A06:C701:9CA3:8D00:E00A:FD10:BA09:E5DD (talk) 21:57, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Partly done: I changed "rejected" to "opposed", which should remove any implication that the Yesha Council rejected the plan as part of a formal negotiation or process. Day Creature (talk) 06:51, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would argue that the reactions of each party, Palestinian leadership and Yesha Council should: 2A06:C701:9CA3:8D00:E00A:FD10:BA09:E5DD (talk) 00:12, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would argue that the reactions of each party, Palestinian leadership and Yesha Council should: a. Appear in different sentences all together, and B. Different verbs should be used for each reaction. For both to appear in the same sentence, especially in this manner, results in an inherent equation of the two, as if both sides had refused the proposal, which is not the case nor is it what the source claims. Palestinian leadership is in a position to oppose the proposal or not, while Yesha Council has no such power or authority. Consider for instance the following sentence: "Attempting to bring about peace in Kashmir, president Washington announced his plan in November last year. His proposal was opposed by both the government of India and the governor of Pakistani Kashmir." - Would the average reader not come to the conclusion that both parties are pertinent to the discussion of the plan in equal or similar terms? If so, which is my claim, and if this assertion is inaccurate, which I argued here and in my original submission, then the current version as amended is still inaccurate and misleading. I submit my original correction for consideration once more, and I would find any version that describes the reaction of both parties in separate sentences, using different and accurate verbs, to be adequate. Thank you for your time and consideration. 2A06:C701:9CA3:8D00:E00A:FD10:BA09:E5DD (talk) 00:32, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 4 October 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

It was proposed in this section that 2020 Trump Israel–Palestine plan be renamed and moved to Donald Trump's 2020 Israel–Palestine plan. result: Moved to 2020 Israel–Palestine peace plan. Closure requested at WP:CR (permalink). A re-read of this RM yielded a consensus against the current title with limited agreement for a different title. In accord with WP:OTHEROPTIONS the closer must choose a title suggested below. The two titles are: Donald Trump's 2020 Israel–Palestine plan – by editor estar8806 2020 Israel–Palestine peace plan – by editor Cinaroot To quote the guide, "As this result does not indicate a consensus for the chosen title, anyone who objects to the closer's decision may make another move request at any time, and is advised to create such a request instead of taking the closure to move review." Thanks and kudos to editors for your input; everyone stay healthy! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. – welcome! – 01:41, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply] Self-reverted closure No consensus seen below to either keep the current title or to rename this article as proposed. Closure requested at WP:CR (permalink). As is usual with a no-consensus outcome, editors can strengthen their arguments, discover new ones, and try again in a few months to change this title. Thanks and kudos to editors for your input; everyone stay healthy! P.I. Ellsworth , ed. – welcome! – 00:51, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply] Move logs: source title · target title This is template {{subst:Requested move/end}}

The Arab–Israeli conflict is designated as a contentious topic with special editing restrictions. Editing and discussing this topic is restricted to extended confirmed users. You are not logged in, so you are not extended confirmed. Your account is extended confirmedis not extended confirmed, but you are an administrator, so your account is extended confirmed by default.

2020 Trump Israel–Palestine plan → Donald Trump's 2020 Israel–Palestine plan – WP:CONSISTENT with Donald Trump's February 2025 Gaza Strip proposal and Donald Trump's September 2025 Gaza Strip proposal. estar8806 (talk) ★ 01:47, 4 October 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Jeffrey34555 (talk) 03:49, 11 October 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. WhatADrag07 (talk) 02:33, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support, per above —Matrix _{ping me}^{when u reply} (t? - c) 16:13, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose It should be 2020 Israel–Palestine peace plan. WP:CONCISE This is not about trump. Official name of the plan is Peace to Prosperity: A Vision to Improve the Lives of the Palestinian and Israeli People Cinaroot (talk) 07:08, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• I support Cinaroot's proposal. Professor Penguino (talk) 04:16, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I third Cinaroot's proposal. Trump's involvement was significant but not enough to warrant a mention in the title. "peace" in this technically correct, if rather dubious Thanks, 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 Easternsahara 🇪🇭🇵🇸🇸🇩 03:09, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: very minimal discussion since last relist WhatADrag07 (talk) 02:33, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject International law, WikiProject Politics, WikiProject Palestine, WikiProject International relations, WikiProject United States Government, WikiProject Politics/American politics, WikiProject Israel, WikiProject United States, WikiProject Arab world, WikiProject United States History, WikiProject Presidents of the United States, WikiProject Presidents of the United States/Donald Trump task force, WikiProject Military history, WikiProject Conservatism, and WikiProject Military history/Post-Cold War task force have been notified of this discussion. WhatADrag07 (talk) 02:34, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.