Roman dominating set

An assignment of the weights 0, 1 or 2 to each vertex such that each vertex with weight 0 is adjacent to at least one vertex of weight 2 is called a Roman dominating function.

In graph theory, a Roman dominating set (RDS) is a special type of dominating set inspired by historical military defense strategies of the Roman Empire. The concept models a scenario where cities (vertices) can be defended by legions stationed either within the city or in neighboring cities. A city is considered secure if it either has at least one legion stationed there, or if it has no legions but is adjacent to a city that has at least two legions, allowing one legion to be sent for defense while leaving the original city still protected.

The Roman domination number of a graph measures the minimum total number of legions needed to protect all cities according to this strategy.

Definition

[edit]

Let be a graph. A Roman dominating function (RDF) is a function such that for every vertex with , there exists a vertex adjacent to with .[1]

The weight of a Roman dominating function is . The Roman domination number is the minimum weight among all Roman dominating functions for .

Equivalently, let be an ordered partition of where . Then is a Roman dominating function if and only if every vertex in is adjacent to at least one vertex in .[1]

Examples

[edit]

For the complete graph with , , achieved by assigning 2 to any single vertex and 0 to all others.

For the path graph and cycle graph , .[1]

For the empty graph , , since each vertex must be assigned at least 1.

For the complete n-partite graph with partition sizes :[1]

  • if .
  • if .
  • if .

Basic properties

[edit]

Several properties of Roman domination were established by Cockayne et al.:[1]

  • For any graph , , where is the domination number.
  • if and only if is the empty graph.
  • If has a vertex of degree , then .
  • For any Roman dominating function :
    • The subgraph induced by has maximum degree at most 1.
    • No edge joins and .
    • Each vertex in is adjacent to at most two vertices in .
    • is a dominating set for the subgraph induced by .

A graph is called a Roman graph if .[2] This occurs if and only if has a Roman dominating function of minimum weight with .

Roman domination value

[edit]

The Roman domination value of a vertex extends the concept of Roman domination by considering how many minimum Roman dominating functions assign positive values to that vertex.[3]

For a graph , let be the set of all -functions (Roman dominating functions of minimum weight). For a vertex , the Roman domination value is defined as:

Some basic properties of Roman domination value are known:[3]

  • , where is the number of -functions
  • If there is a graph isomorphism mapping vertex in to vertex in , then

Extremal problems

[edit]

Several extremal results have been established for Roman domination numbers.

For any connected -vertex graph with , .[4] Equality holds if and only if is or obtained from copies of by adding a connected subgraph on the set of centers.

For any -vertex graph with , .[4]

For any -vertex graph with , .[4]

If is a connected -vertex graph with and , then .[4]

Algorithms and complexity

[edit]

The decision problem for Roman domination is NP-complete, even when restricted to bipartite, chordal, or planar graphs.[1] However, polynomial-time algorithms exist for computing the Roman domination number on interval graphs, cographs, and strongly chordal graphs.[2]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f Cockayne, E. J.; Dreyer, P. A.; Hedetniemi, S. M.; Hedetniemi, S. T. (2004), "Roman domination in graphs", Discrete Mathematics, 278 (1–3): 11–22, doi:10.1016/j.disc.2003.06.004
  2. ^ a b Fu, Xueliang; Yang, Yuansheng; Jiang, Baoqi (2009), "Roman domination in regular graphs", Discrete Mathematics, 309 (6): 1528–1537, doi:10.1016/j.disc.2008.03.006
  3. ^ a b Pushpam, P. R. L.; Sampath, P. (2024), "Roman domination value in graphs" (PDF), Communications in Combinatorics and Optimization, doi:10.22049/cco.2024.28899.1769
  4. ^ a b c d Chambers, E. W.; Kinnersley, W.; Prince, N.; West, D. B. (2009), "Extremal problems for Roman domination", SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, 23 (3): 1575–1586, doi:10.1137/070699688