Rectifier (neural networks)

Plot of the ReLU (blue) and GELU (green) functions near x = 0

In the context of artificial neural networks, the rectifier or ReLU (rectified linear unit) activation function^[1][2] is an activation function defined as the non-negative part of its argument, i.e., the ramp function:

${\displaystyle \operatorname {ReLU} (x)=x^{+}=\max(0,x)={\frac {x+|x|}{2}}={\begin{cases}x&{\text{if }}x>0,\\0&x\leq 0\end{cases}}}$

where ${\displaystyle x}$ is the input to a neuron. This is analogous to half-wave rectification in electrical engineering.

ReLU is one of the most popular activation functions for artificial neural networks,^[3] and finds application in computer vision^[4] and speech recognition^[5][6] using deep neural nets and computational neuroscience.^[7][8]

History

The ReLU was first used by Alston Householder in 1941 as a mathematical abstraction of biological neural networks.^[9]

Kunihiko Fukushima in 1969 used ReLU in the context of visual feature extraction in hierarchical neural networks.^[10][11] 30 years later, Hahnloser et al. argued that ReLU approximates the biological relationship between neural firing rates and input current, in addition to enabling recurrent neural network dynamics to stabilise under weaker criteria.^[12][13]

Prior to 2010, most activation functions used were the logistic sigmoid (which is inspired by probability theory; see logistic regression) and its more numerically efficient^[14] counterpart, the hyperbolic tangent. Around 2010, the use of ReLU became common again.

Jarrett et al. (2009) noted that rectification by either absolute or ReLU (which they called "positive part") was critical for object recognition in convolutional neural networks (CNNs), specifically because it allows average pooling without neighboring filter outputs cancelling each other out. They hypothesized that the use of sigmoid or tanh was responsible for poor performance in previous CNNs.^[15]

Nair and Hinton (2010) made a theoretical argument that the softplus activation function should be used, in that the softplus function numerically approximates the sum of an exponential number of linear models that share parameters. They then proposed ReLU as a good approximation to it. They noted that ReLU allows "intensity equivariance" in the sense that multiplying input image by a constant ${\displaystyle k}$ multiplies the output also, which is not true for sigmoid or tanh. They found that ReLU activation allowed good empirical performance in restricted Boltzmann machines.^[16]

Glorot et al (2011) argued that ReLU has the following advantages over sigmoid or tanh. ReLU is more similar to biological neurons' responses in their main operating regime. ReLU avoids vanishing gradients. ReLU is cheaper to compute. ReLU creates sparse representation naturally, because many hidden units output exactly zero for a given input. They also found empirically that deep networks trained with ReLU can achieve strong performance without unsupervised pre-training, especially on large, purely supervised tasks.^[4]

Advantages

Advantages of ReLU include:

• Sparse activation: for example, in a randomly initialized network, only about 50% of hidden units are activated (i.e. have a non-zero output).
• Better gradient propagation: fewer vanishing gradient problems compared to sigmoidal activation functions that saturate in both directions.^[4]
• Efficiency: only requires comparison and addition.
• Scale-invariant (homogeneous, or "intensity equivariance"^[16]):

${\displaystyle \max(0,ax)=a\max(0,x){\text{ for }}a\geq 0}$.

Potential problems

Possible downsides can include:

• Non-differentiability at zero (however, it is differentiable anywhere else, and the value of the derivative at zero can be chosen to be 0 or 1 arbitrarily).
• Not zero-centered: ReLU outputs are always non-negative. This can make it harder for the network to learn during backpropagation, because gradient updates tend to push weights in one direction (positive or negative). Batch normalization can help address this.^{[citation needed]}
• ReLU is unbounded.
• Redundancy of the parametrization: Because ReLU is scale-invariant, the network computes the exact same function by scaling the weights and biases in front of a ReLU activation by ${\displaystyle k}$, and the weights after by ${\displaystyle 1/k}$.^[4]
• Dying ReLU: ReLU neurons can sometimes be pushed into states in which they become inactive for essentially all inputs. In this state, no gradients flow backward through the neuron, and so the neuron becomes stuck in a perpetually inactive state (it "dies"). This is a form of the vanishing gradient problem. In some cases, large numbers of neurons in a network can become stuck in dead states, effectively decreasing the model capacity and potentially even halting the learning process. This problem typically arises when the learning rate is set too high. It may be mitigated by using "leaky" ReLU instead, where a small positive slope is assigned for ${\displaystyle x<0}$. However, depending on the task, performance may be reduced.

Variants

Piecewise-linear variants

Leaky ReLU allows a small, positive gradient when the unit is inactive,^[6] helping to mitigate the vanishing gradient problem. This gradient is defined by a parameter ${\displaystyle \alpha }$, typically set to 0.01–0.3.^[17][18]

${\displaystyle f(x)={\begin{cases}x&x>0,\\\alpha x&x\leq 0,\end{cases}}\qquad f'(x)={\begin{cases}1&x>0,\\\alpha &x\leq 0.\end{cases}}}$

The same function can also be expressed without the piecewise notation as:

${\displaystyle f(x)={\frac {1+\alpha }{2}}x+{\frac {1-\alpha }{2}}|x|}$

Parametric ReLU (PReLU) takes this idea further by making ${\displaystyle \alpha }$ a learnable parameter along with the other network parameters.^[19]

Note that for ${\displaystyle \alpha \leq 1}$, this is equivalent to

${\displaystyle f(x)=\max(x,\alpha x)}$

and thus has a relation to "maxout" networks.^[19]

Concatenated ReLU (CReLU) preserves positive and negative phase information:^[20]

${\displaystyle f(x)=[\operatorname {ReLU} (x),\operatorname {ReLU} (-x)].}$

Other non-linear variants

DELU

ExtendeD Exponential Linear Unit (DELU) is an activation function which is smoother within the neighborhood of zero and sharper for bigger values, allowing better allocation of neurons in the learning process for higher performance. Thanks to its unique design, it has been shown that DELU may obtain higher classification accuracy than ReLU and ELU.^[21]

${\displaystyle f(x)={\begin{cases}x&x>x_{c},\\(e^{ax}-1)/b&x\leq x_{c}\end{cases}}\qquad f'(x)={\begin{cases}1&x>x_{c},\\(a/b)e^{ax}&x\leq x_{c}\end{cases}}}$

In these formulas, ${\displaystyle a}$, ${\displaystyle b}$ and ${\displaystyle x_{c}}$ are hyperparameter values which could be set as default constraints ${\displaystyle a=1}$, ${\displaystyle b=2}$ and ${\displaystyle x_{c}=1.25643}$, as done in the original work.

Gaussian-error linear unit (GELU)

GELU is a smooth approximation to the rectifier:

${\displaystyle f(x)=x\Phi (x),}$

${\displaystyle f'(x)=x\Phi '(x)+\Phi (x)}$

where ${\displaystyle \Phi (x)=P(X\leqslant x)}$ is the cumulative distribution function of the standard normal distribution.

This activation function is illustrated in the figure at the start of this article. It has a "bump" to the left of x < 0 and serves as the default activation for models such as BERT.^[22]

SiLU

Main article: Swish function

The swish function

The SiLU (sigmoid linear unit) or swish function^[23] is another smooth approximation which uses the sigmoid function, first introduced in the GELU paper:^[22]

${\displaystyle f(x)=x\cdot \operatorname {sigmoid} (x),}$

${\displaystyle f'(x)=x\cdot \operatorname {sigmoid} '(x)+\operatorname {sigmoid} (x)}$

Softplus

Main article: Softplus

Plot of the softplus function and the ramp function.

A smooth approximation to the rectifier is the analytic function

${\displaystyle f(x)=\ln(1+e^{x}),\qquad f'(x)={\frac {e^{x}}{1+e^{x}}}={\frac {1}{1+e^{-x}}}}$

which is called the softplus^[24][4] or SmoothReLU function.^[25] For large negative ${\displaystyle x}$ it is roughly ${\displaystyle \ln 1}$, so just above 0, while for large positive ${\displaystyle x}$ it is roughly ${\displaystyle \ln(e^{x})}$, so just above ${\displaystyle x}$.

This function can be approximated as:

${\displaystyle \ln \left(1+e^{x}\right)\approx {\begin{cases}\ln 2,&x=0,\\[6pt]{\frac {x}{1-e^{-x/\ln 2}}},&x\neq 0\end{cases}}}$

By making the change of variables ${\displaystyle x=y\ln(2)}$, this is equivalent to

${\displaystyle \log _{2}(1+2^{y})\approx {\begin{cases}1,&y=0,\\[6pt]{\frac {y}{1-e^{-y}}},&y\neq 0\end{cases}}}$

A sharpness parameter ${\displaystyle k}$ may be included:

${\displaystyle f(x)={\frac {\ln(1+e^{kx})}{k}},\qquad f'(x)={\frac {e^{kx}}{1+e^{kx}}}={\frac {1}{1+e^{-kx}}}}$

The derivative of softplus is the logistic function.

The logistic sigmoid function is a smooth approximation of the derivative of the rectifier, the Heaviside step function.

The multivariable generalization of single-variable softplus is the LogSumExp with the first argument set to zero:

${\displaystyle \operatorname {LSE_{0}} ^{+}(x_{1},\dots ,x_{n}):=\operatorname {LSE} (0,x_{1},\dots ,x_{n})=\ln(1+e^{x_{1}}+\cdots +e^{x_{n}})}$

The LogSumExp function is

${\displaystyle \operatorname {LSE} (x_{1},\dots ,x_{n})=\ln(e^{x_{1}}+\cdots +e^{x_{n}})}$

and its gradient is the softmax; the softmax with the first argument set to zero is the multivariable generalization of the logistic function. Both LogSumExp and softmax are used in machine learning.

ELU

Exponential linear units try to make the mean activations closer to zero, which speeds up learning. It has been shown that ELUs can obtain higher classification accuracy than ReLUs.^[26]

${\displaystyle f(x)={\begin{cases}x&x>0,\\\alpha \left(e^{x}-1\right)&x\leq 0\end{cases}}\qquad f'(x)={\begin{cases}1&x>0,\\\alpha e^{x}&x\leq 0\end{cases}}}$

In these formulas, ${\displaystyle \alpha }$ is a hyperparameter to be tuned with the constraint ${\displaystyle \alpha \geq 0}$.

Given the same interpretation of ${\displaystyle \alpha }$, ELU can be viewed as a smoothed version of a shifted ReLU (SReLU), which has the form ${\displaystyle f(x)=\max(-\alpha ,x)}$.

Mish

The mish function can also be used as a smooth approximation of the rectifier.^[23] It is defined as

${\displaystyle f(x)=x\tanh {\big (}\operatorname {softplus} (x){\big )},}$

where ${\displaystyle \tanh(x)}$ is the hyperbolic tangent, and ${\displaystyle \operatorname {softplus} (x)}$ is the softplus function.

Mish is non-monotonic and self-gated.^[27] It was inspired by Swish, itself a variant of ReLU.^[27]

Squareplus

Squareplus^[28] is the function

${\displaystyle f(x)={\frac {x+{\sqrt {x^{2}+b}}}{2}}}$

where ${\displaystyle b\geq 0}$ is a hyperparameter that determines the "size" of the curved region near ${\displaystyle x=0}$. (For example, letting ${\displaystyle b=0}$ yields ReLU, and letting ${\displaystyle b=4}$ yields the metallic mean function.) Squareplus shares many properties with softplus: It is monotonic, strictly positive, approaches 0 as ${\displaystyle x\to -\infty }$, approaches the identity as ${\displaystyle x\to +\infty }$, and is ${\displaystyle C^{\infty }}$ smooth. However, squareplus can be computed using only algebraic functions, making it well-suited for settings where computational resources or instruction sets are limited. Additionally, squareplus requires no special consideration to ensure numerical stability when ${\displaystyle x}$ is large.

See also

• Softmax function
• Sigmoid function
• Tobit model
• Layer (deep learning)

References

1. Brownlee, Jason (8 January 2019). "A Gentle Introduction to the Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU)". Machine Learning Mastery. Retrieved 8 April 2021.
2. Liu, Danqing (30 November 2017). "A Practical Guide to ReLU". Medium. Retrieved 8 April 2021.
3. Ramachandran, Prajit; Barret, Zoph; Quoc, V. Le (October 16, 2017). "Searching for Activation Functions". arXiv:1710.05941 [cs.NE].
4. Xavier Glorot; Antoine Bordes; Yoshua Bengio (2011). Deep sparse rectifier neural networks (PDF). AISTATS. Rectifier and softplus activation functions. The second one is a smooth version of the first.
5. László Tóth (2013). Phone Recognition with Deep Sparse Rectifier Neural Networks (PDF). ICASSP.
6. Andrew L. Maas, Awni Y. Hannun, Andrew Y. Ng (2014). Rectifier Nonlinearities Improve Neural Network Acoustic Models.
7. Hansel, D.; van Vreeswijk, C. (2002). "How noise contributes to contrast invariance of orientation tuning in cat visual cortex". J. Neurosci. 22 (12): 5118–5128. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-12-05118.2002. PMC 6757721. PMID 12077207.
8. Kadmon, Jonathan; Sompolinsky, Haim (2015-11-19). "Transition to Chaos in Random Neuronal Networks". Physical Review X. 5 (4): 041030. arXiv:1508.06486. Bibcode:2015PhRvX...5d1030K. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.5.041030. S2CID 7813832.
9. Householder, Alston S. (June 1941). "A theory of steady-state activity in nerve-fiber networks: I. Definitions and preliminary lemmas". The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics. 3 (2): 63–69. doi:10.1007/BF02478220. ISSN 0007-4985.
10. Fukushima, K. (1969). "Visual feature extraction by a multilayered network of analog threshold elements". IEEE Transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics. 5 (4): 322–333. doi:10.1109/TSSC.1969.300225.
11. Fukushima, K.; Miyake, S. (1982). "Neocognitron: A Self-Organizing Neural Network Model for a Mechanism of Visual Pattern Recognition". Competition and Cooperation in Neural Nets. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics. Vol. 45. Springer. pp. 267–285. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-46466-9_18. ISBN 978-3-540-11574-8. {{cite book}}: |journal= ignored (help)
12. Hahnloser, R.; Sarpeshkar, R.; Mahowald, M. A.; Douglas, R. J.; Seung, H. S. (2000). "Digital selection and analogue amplification coexist in a cortex-inspired silicon circuit". Nature. 405 (6789): 947–951. Bibcode:2000Natur.405..947H. doi:10.1038/35016072. PMID 10879535. S2CID 4399014.
13. Hahnloser, Richard; Seung, H. Sebastian (2000). "Permitted and Forbidden Sets in Symmetric Threshold-Linear Networks". Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 13. MIT Press.
14. Yann LeCun; Leon Bottou; Genevieve B. Orr; Klaus-Robert Müller (1998). "Efficient BackProp" (PDF). In G. Orr; K. Müller (eds.). Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade. Springer.
15. Jarrett, Kevin; Kavukcuoglu, Koray; Ranzato, Marc'Aurelio; LeCun, Yann (September 2009). "What is the best multi-stage architecture for object recognition?". 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision: 2146–2153. doi:10.1109/ICCV.2009.5459469.
16. Nair, Vinod, and Geoffrey E. Hinton. "Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines." Proceedings of the 27th international conference on machine learning (ICML-10). 2010.
17. "PyTorch Leaky ReLU docs".
18. "TensorFlow Leaky ReLU docs".
19. He, Kaiming; Zhang, Xiangyu; Ren, Shaoqing; Sun, Jian (2015). "Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on Image Net Classification". arXiv:1502.01852 [cs.CV].
20. Shang, Wenling; Sohn, Kihyuk; Almeida, Diogo; Lee, Honglak (2016-06-11). "Understanding and Improving Convolutional Neural Networks via Concatenated Rectified Linear Units". Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR: 2217–2225. arXiv:1603.05201.
21. Çatalbaş, Burak; Morgül, Ömer (16 August 2023). "Deep learning with ExtendeD Exponential Linear Unit (DELU)". Neural Computing and Applications. 35 (30): 22705–22724. Retrieved 20 April 2025.
22. Hendrycks, Dan; Gimpel, Kevin (2016). "Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)". arXiv:1606.08415 [cs.LG].
23. Diganta Misra (23 Aug 2019), Mish: A Self Regularized Non-Monotonic Activation Function (PDF), arXiv:1908.08681v1, retrieved 26 March 2022.
24. Dugas, Charles; Bengio, Yoshua; Bélisle, François; Nadeau, Claude; Garcia, René (2000-01-01). "Incorporating second-order functional knowledge for better option pricing" (PDF). Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS'00). MIT Press: 451–457. Since the sigmoid h has a positive first derivative, its primitive, which we call softplus, is convex.
25. "Smooth Rectifier Linear Unit (SmoothReLU) Forward Layer". Developer Guide for Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. 2017. Retrieved 2018-12-04.
26. Clevert, Djork-Arné; Unterthiner, Thomas; Hochreiter, Sepp (2015). "Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)". arXiv:1511.07289 [cs.LG].
27. Shaw, Sweta (2020-05-10). "Activation Functions Compared with Experiments". W&B. Retrieved 2022-07-11.
28. Barron, Jonathan T. (22 December 2021). "Squareplus: A Softplus-Like Algebraic Rectifier". arXiv:2112.11687 [cs.NE].