Monarchy

A monarchy is a hereditary form of government in which political power is legally passed on to the family members of the monarch, a head of state who rules for life.[1] While monarchs gain their power depending on specific succession laws, they can also gain their authority via election.[2]

Monarchies were the most common form of government until the 20th century, when republics replaced many monarchies, notably at the end of World War I.[3][4] As of 2024, forty-three sovereign nations in the world have a monarch, including fifteen Commonwealth realms that share King Charles III as their head of state. Other than that, there is a range of sub-national monarchical entities. Most of the modern monarchies are constitutional monarchies, retaining under a constitution unique legal and ceremonial roles for monarchs exercising limited or no political power, similar to heads of state in a parliamentary republic.[4]

Etymology

[edit]

The word monarch first appeared in the mid-15th century as monark, meaning “a supreme governor for life, a sole or autocratic ruler of a state.” It comes from the Old French monarche (14th century, Modern French monarque) and directly from the Late Latin monarcha, which in turn derives from the Greek monarkhēs, meaning “one who rules alone” (see monarchy).[5] The term monarchy dates back to the mid-14th century, when it referred to a kingdom or territory ruled by a monarch, and by the late 14th century it also meant rule by a single person with supreme power. It comes from Old French monarchie (13th century), meaning “sovereignty” or “absolute power,” which was borrowed from Late Latin monarchia and ultimately from Greek monarkhia, “absolute rule,” literally “ruling of one,” from monos (“alone”) and arkhein (“to rule”).[6]

History

[edit]
The Weld-Blundell Prism, inscribed with the Sumerian King List

The similar form of societal hierarchy known as chiefdom or tribal kingship is prehistoric. Chiefdoms provided the concept of state formation, which started with civilizations such as Mesopotamia, Ancient Egypt and the Indus Valley civilization.[7] In some parts of the world, chiefdoms became monarchies.[8] Some of the oldest recorded and evidenced monarchies were Narmer, Pharaoh of Ancient Egypt c. 3100 BCE, and Enmebaragesi, a Sumerian King of Kish c. 2600 BCE.

From earliest records, monarchs could be directly hereditary, while others were elected from among eligible members. With the Egyptian, Chinese, Indian,[9] Mesopotamian, Sudanic,[10] reconstructed Proto-Indo-European religion, and others, the monarch held sacral functions directly connected to sacrifice and was sometimes identified with having divine ancestry, possibly establishing a notion of the divine right of kings.

Polybius identified monarchy as one of three "benign" basic forms of government (monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy), opposed to the three "malignant" basic forms of government (tyranny, oligarchy, and ochlocracy). The monarch in classical antiquity is often identified as "king" or "ruler" (translating archon, basileus, rex, tyrannos, etc.) or as "queen" (basilinna, basilissa, basileia or basilis;[11] regina). Polybius originally understood monarchy as a component of republics, but since antiquity monarchy has contrasted with forms of republic, where executive power is wielded by free citizens and their assemblies.[12] The 4th-century BCE Hindu text Arthasastra laid out the ethics of monarchism.[13] In antiquity, some monarchies were abolished in favour of such assemblies in Rome (Roman Republic, 509 BCE), and Athens (Athenian democracy, 500 BCE).

Map of monarchies and republics in Europe, 1648

By the 17th century, monarchy was challenged by evolving parliamentarism e.g. through regional assemblies (such as the Icelandic Commonwealth, the Swiss Landsgemeinde and later Tagsatzung, and the High Medieval communal movement linked to the rise of medieval town privileges) and by modern anti-monarchism e.g. of the temporary overthrow of the English monarchy by the Parliament of England in 1649, the American Revolution of 1776 and the French Revolution of 1789. One of many opponents of that trend was Elizabeth Dawbarn, whose anonymous Dialogue between Clara Neville and Louisa Mills, on Loyalty (1794) features "silly Louisa, who admires liberty, Tom Paine and the US, [who is] lectured by Clara on God's approval of monarchy" and on the influence women can exert on men.[14]

Since then advocacy of the abolition of a monarchy or respectively of republics has been called republicanism, while the advocacy of monarchies is called monarchism. As such republics have become the opposing and alternative form of government to monarchy,[15][16][17] despite some having seen infringements through lifelong or even hereditary heads of state, such as in North Korea.[18]

With the rise of republicanism, a diverse division between republicanism developed in the 19th-century politics (such as anti-monarchist radicalism) and conservative or even reactionary monarchism. In the following 20th century many countries abolished the monarchy and became republics, especially in the wake of World War I and World War II.

Today forty-three sovereign nations in the world have a monarch, including fifteen Commonwealth realms that have Charles III as the head of state. Most modern monarchs are constitutional monarchs, who retain a unique legal and ceremonial role but exercise limited or no political power under a constitution. Many are so-called crowned republics, surviving particularly in small states.[19]

In some nations, however, such as Morocco, Qatar, Liechtenstein, and Thailand, the hereditary monarch has more political influence than any other single source of authority in the state.[20][21][22][23]

According to a 2020 study, monarchy arose as a system of governance because of an efficiency in governing large populations and expansive territories during periods when coordinating such populations was difficult. The authors argue that monarchy declined as an efficient regime type with innovations in communications and transportation technology, as the efficiency of monarchy relative to other regime types declined.[24]

According to a 2023 study, monarchy has persisted as a regime type because it can accommodate demands for democratization better than other forms of autocratic rule: "Monarchies can democratize without destabilizing the leadership through transitioning to a democratic constitutional monarchy. The prospect of retaining the ruler appeals to opposition groups who value both democracy and stability, but it also has implications for their ability to organize and sustain mass protest."[25]

Characteristics and role

[edit]
King George III of the United Kingdom, coronation portrait by Allan Ramsay, 1762

Monarchies are associated with hereditary reign, in which monarchs reign for life and the responsibilities and power of the position pass to their child or another member of their family when they die. Most monarchs, both historically and in the modern-day, have been born and brought up within a royal family, the centre of the royal household and court. Growing up in a royal family (called a dynasty when it continues for several generations), future monarchs are often trained for their expected future responsibilities as monarch.[26]

Different systems of hereditary succession have been used, such as proximity of blood, primogeniture, and agnatic seniority (Salic law). While most monarchs in history have been male, many female monarchs also have reigned.[27] The term "queen regnant" refers to a ruling monarch, while "queen consort" refers to the wife of a reigning king. Rule may be hereditary in practice without being considered a monarchy: there have been some family dictatorships (and also political families) in many democracies.

Some monarchies are not hereditary. In an elective monarchy, monarchs are elected or appointed by some body (an electoral college) for life or a defined period. Four elective monarchies exist today: Cambodia, Malaysia and the United Arab Emirates are 20th-century creations, while one (the papacy) is ancient.[28]

A self-proclaimed monarchy is established when a person claims the monarchy without any historical ties to a previous dynasty. There are examples of republican leaders who have proclaimed themselves monarchs: Napoleon I of France declared himself Emperor of the French and ruled the First French Empire after having held the title of First Consul of the French Republic for five years from his seizing power in the coup of 18 Brumaire. President Jean-Bédel Bokassa of the Central African Republic declared himself Emperor of the Central African Empire in 1976.[29] Yuan Shikai, the first formal President of the Republic of China, crowned himself Emperor of the short-lived "Empire of China" a few years after the Republic of China was founded.[30]

Powers of the monarch

[edit]
King Salman of Saudi Arabia is an absolute monarch.
  • In an absolute monarchy, the monarch rules with absolute power over the state and government
  • In a constitutional monarchy, the monarch's power is subject to a constitution. In most current constitutional monarchies, the monarch is mainly a ceremonial figurehead symbol of national unity and state continuity.
    • Semi-constitutional monarchies exhibit fewer parliamentary powers or simply monarchs with more authority.[31] The term "parliamentary monarchy" may be used to differentiate from semi-constitutional monarchies.

Succession

[edit]

Hereditary monarchies

[edit]
Political Map of Europe with Monarchical states colour-coded
Current European monarchies by succession method:
  Male-preference cognatic primogeniture, to be changed to absolute primogeniture

In a hereditary monarchy, the position of monarch is inherited according to a statutory or customary order of succession, usually within one royal family tracing its origin through a historical dynasty or bloodline. This usually means that the heir to the throne is known well in advance of becoming monarch to ensure a smooth succession.[32][33]

Primogeniture, in which the eldest child of the monarch is first in line to become monarch, is the most common system in hereditary monarchy. The order of succession is usually affected by rules on gender. Historically "agnatic primogeniture" or "patrilineal primogeniture" was favoured, that is inheritance according to seniority of birth among the sons of a monarch or head of family, with sons and their male issue inheriting before brothers and their male issue, to the total exclusion of females and descendants through females from succession.[34] This complete exclusion of females from dynastic succession is commonly referred to as application of the Salic law. Another variation on agnatic primogeniture was the so-called semi-Salic law, or "agnatic-cognatic primogeniture", which allowed women to succeed only at the extinction of all the male descendants in the male line of the particular legislator.[34][35]

Before primogeniture was enshrined in European law and tradition, kings would often secure the succession by having their successor (usually their eldest son) crowned during their own lifetime, so for a time there would be two kings in coregency—a senior king and a junior king. Examples were Henry the Young King of England and the early Direct Capetians in France. Sometimes, however, primogeniture can operate through the female line.

King Leopold I, an elected founder of the hereditary monarchy of Belgium

In 1980, Sweden became the first monarchy to declare equal (full cognatic) primogeniture, meaning that the eldest child of the monarch, whether female or male, ascends to the throne.[36] Other kingdoms (such as the Netherlands in 1983, Norway in 1990, Belgium in 1991, Denmark in 2009, and Luxembourg[37] in 2011) have since followed suit. The United Kingdom adopted absolute (equal) primogeniture (subject to the claims of existing heirs) on April 25, 2013, following agreement by the prime ministers of the sixteen Commonwealth Realms at the 22nd Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting.[38]

Other hereditary systems of succession included tanistry, which is semi-elective and gives weight to merit and Agnatic seniority. In some monarchies, such as Saudi Arabia, succession to the throne first passes to the monarch's next eldest brother, and only after that to the monarch's children (agnatic seniority). On June 21, 2017, King Salman of Saudi Arabi revolted against this style of monarchy and elected his son to inherit the throne.[39][40]

Elective monarchies

[edit]
Pope Francis, Sovereign of the Vatican City State from 2013 to 2025

In an elective monarchy, monarchs are elected or appointed by somebody (an electoral college) for life or a defined period, but then reign like any other monarch. There is no popular vote involved in elective monarchies, as the elective body usually consists of a small number of eligible people. Historical examples of elective monarchy are the Holy Roman Emperors (chosen by prince-electors but often coming from the same dynasty) and the free election of kings of the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth. For example, Pepin the Short (father of Charlemagne) was elected King of the Franks by an assembly of Frankish leading men;[41] nobleman Stanisław August Poniatowski of Poland was an elected king, as was Frederick I of Denmark. Gallic and Germanic peoples also had elective monarchies.

The Pope of the Roman Catholic Church (who rules as Sovereign of the Vatican City State) is elected for life by the College of Cardinals.[42] In the Sovereign Military Order of Malta, the Prince and Grand Master is elected for life tenure by the Council Complete of State from within its members. In Malaysia, the federal king, called the Yang di-Pertuan Agong or Paramount Ruler, is elected for a five-year term from among and by the hereditary rulers (mostly sultans) of nine of the federation's constitutive states, all on the Malay peninsula.[43] The United Arab Emirates also chooses its federal leaders from among emirs of the federated states. Furthermore, Andorra has a unique constitutional arrangement as one of its heads of state is the President of the French Republic in the form of a Co-Prince.[44] In New Zealand, the Maori King, head of the Kingitanga Movement, is elected by a council of Maori elders at the funeral of their predecessor, which is also where their coronation takes place. All of the Heads of the Maori King Movement have been descendants of the first Maori King, Potatau Te Wherowhero, who was elected and became King in June 1858.

Usurpation

[edit]

Another way monarchs have historically gained royal power is by seizing it, either by force or other illegitimate measures. Historically usurpation has usually happened via a coup or by fraudulently claiming be a descendant of a ruler that they may or may not be related to. According to Herodotus, this was done by someone impersonating Smerdis in order to seize the throne of Cyrus the Great after his death.[45]

Other ways of succession

[edit]

By accession

[edit]

The legitimacy and authorities of monarchs are often proclaimed and recognized through occupying and being invested with insignia, seats, deeds and titles, like in the course of coronations.

This is especially employed to legitimize and settle disputed successions, changes in ways of succession, status of a monarch (e.g. as in the case of the privilegium maius deed) or new monarchies altogether (e.g. as in the case of the coronation of Napoleon I).

Dynasties

[edit]

Succession crisis

[edit]

In cases of succession challenges, it can be instrumental for pretenders to secure or install legitimacy through the above, for example proof of accession like insignia, through treaties or a claim of a divine mandate to rule (e.g. by Hong Xiuquan and his Taiping Heavenly Kingdom).

Current monarchies

[edit]
World's states colored by systems of government:
Parliamentary systems: Head of government is elected or nominated by and accountable to the legislature.
  Constitutional monarchy with a ceremonial monarch
  Parliamentary republic with a ceremonial president

Presidential system: Head of government (president) is popularly elected and independent of the legislature.
  Presidential republic

Hybrid systems:
  Semi-presidential republic: Executive president is independent of the legislature; head of government is appointed by the president and is accountable to the legislature.
  Assembly-independent republic: Head of government (president or directory) is elected by the legislature, but is not accountable to it.

Other systems:
  Theocratic republic: Supreme Leader is both head of state and church and holds significant executive and legislative power
  Semi-constitutional monarchy: Monarch holds significant executive or legislative power.
  Absolute monarchy: Monarch has unlimited power.
  One-party state: Power is constitutionally linked to a single political party.
  Military junta: Committee of military leaders controls the government; constitutional provisions are suspended.
  Governments with no constitutional basis: No constitutionally defined basis to current regime, i.e., provisional governments or Islamic theocracies.
  Dependent territories or places without governments

Note: this chart represents the de jure systems of government, not the de facto degree of democracy.

Currently, there several countries in the world with a monarch as head of state. They fall roughly into the following categories:

Commonwealth realms

[edit]

King Charles III is, separately, monarch of fifteen Commonwealth realms (Antigua and Barbuda, the Commonwealth of Australia, the Commonwealth of the Bahamas, Belize, Canada, Grenada, Jamaica, New Zealand, the Independent State of Papua New Guinea, the Federation of Saint Christopher and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, the Solomon Islands, Tuvalu and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland). They evolved out of the British Empire into fully independent states within the Commonwealth of Nations that retain the King as head of state.[46]

Other European constitutional monarchies

[edit]

The Principality of Andorra, the Kingdom of Belgium, the Kingdom of Denmark, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Kingdom of Norway, the Kingdom of Spain, and the Kingdom of Sweden are fully democratic states in which the monarch has a limited or largely ceremonial role.[47][48][49][50]

Andorra is unique among all existing monarchies, as it is a diarchy, with the co-princes being shared by the president of France and the bishop of Urgell.[47]

European semi-constitutional monarchies

[edit]

A semi-constitutional monarchy is a monarchy where the monarch rules according to a democratic constitution but still retains substantial powers. The Principality of Liechtenstein and the Principality of Monaco are European semi-constitutional monarchies.[51] For example, the 2003 Constitution referendum gave the Prince of Liechtenstein the power to veto any law that the Landtag (parliament) proposes, while the Landtag can veto any law that the Prince tries to pass.[52] The prince can appoint or dismiss any elective member or government employee. The prince of Monaco has simpler powers; he cannot appoint or dismiss any elective member or government employee to or from his or her post, but he can elect the minister of state, government council and judges.[53]

Monarchies in the Muslim world

[edit]

The monarchies of the Kingdom of Bahrain, the Brunei Darussalam, the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, the State of Kuwait, Malaysia, the Kingdom of Morocco, the Sultanate of Oman, the State of Qatar, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates generally retain far more powers than their European or Commonwealth counterparts.[54] Brunei, Oman, and Saudi Arabia are absolute monarchies;[55][56] Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar and United Arab Emirates are classified as mixed, meaning there are representative bodies but the monarch retains most of his powers. Jordan, Malaysia, and Morocco are constitutional monarchies.

East and Southeast Asian constitutional monarchies

[edit]

The Kingdom of Bhutan, the Kingdom of Cambodia, the Kingdom of Thailand, and Japan are constitutional monarchies where the monarch has a limited or merely ceremonial role. Bhutan made the change in 2008.[57] Cambodia had its own monarchy after independence from the French colonial empire, but it was deposed after the Khmer Rouge came into power. The monarchy was subsequently restored in the peace agreement of 1993. Thailand transitioned into a constitutional monarchy over the course of the 20th century. Japan has had a monarchy, an emperor, according to legend, since Emperor Jimmu (reigned 660–585 BCE), making it the world's oldest existing monarchy.[58] After their defeat in the Second World War, Japan was forced into limiting the power of the Emperor, giving almost all of it to the National Diet.

Other monarchies

[edit]

Eswatini is unique among these monarchies, often being considered a diarchy: the King, or Ngwenyama, rules alongside his mother, the Ndlovukati, as dual heads of state.[59][60] This was originally intended to provide a check on political power. The Ngwenyama, however, is considered the administrative head of state, while the Ndlovukati is considered the spiritual and national head of state, a position which more or less has become symbolic in recent years.[61]

The Pope is the absolute monarch of the Vatican City State (a separate entity from the Holy See) by virtue of his position as head of the Roman Catholic Church and Bishop of Rome; he is an elected rather than a hereditary ruler, and does not have to be a citizen of the territory prior to his election by the cardinals.[62][63]

In Samoa, the position of head of state is described in Part III of the 1960 Samoan constitution. At the time the constitution was adopted, it was anticipated that future heads of state would be chosen from among the four Tama a 'Aiga "royal" paramount chiefs. However, this is not required by the constitution, and, for this reason, Samoa can be considered a republic rather than a constitutional monarchy. However, each member of the Samoan parliament, except for the two seats reserved for non-Samoans, must be a matai, a member of the hereditary political system known as the Faʻamatai.[64]

The ruling Kim family in North Korea (Kim Il Sung, Kim Jong Il and Kim Jong Un) has been described as a de facto absolute monarchy[65][66][67] or a "hereditary dictatorship".[68] In 2013, Clause 2 of Article 10 of the new edited Ten Fundamental Principles of the Korean Workers' Party states that the party and revolution must be carried "eternally" by the "Baekdu (Kim's) bloodline".[69] This though does not mean it is a de jure absolute monarchy, as the country's official name is the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. The al-Assad family, which ruled Syria from 1971 to 2024, was similarly categorised as such.[68]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Spellman, W. M. (2001). Monarchies 1000-2000. Reaktion Books. ISBN 978-1-86189-087-0.
  2. ^ "The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth". In Our Time. October 14, 2021. BBC Radio 4. Retrieved March 29, 2023.
  3. ^ Political Systems, Structures, and Functions. Britannica Educational. June 2012. ISBN 978-1-61530-747-0.
  4. ^ a b Kimizuka, Naotaka (July 2024). Constitutional Monarchy of the Twenty-First Century. Springer. ISBN 978-981-97-4327-8.
  5. ^ "Search 'monarch' on etymonline".
  6. ^ "Monarchy - Etymology, Origin & Meaning".
  7. ^ Conrad Phillip Kottak (1991). Cultural Anthropology. McGraw-Hill. p. 124. ISBN 978-0-07-035615-3.
  8. ^ A. Adu Boahen; J. F. Ade Ajayi; Michael Tidy (1986). Topics in West African History. Longman Group. p. 19. ISBN 978-0-582-58504-1.
  9. ^ Political Violence in Ancient India, p.23, "In later Vedic texts, the frequency of the word "dharma" decreased and its connotations shrank; it came to be especially connected with kingship and with the royal consecration ritual known as the rājasūya."
  10. ^ Traditions and encounters. McGraw–Hill Education. p. 63. By about 5000 b.c.e. many Sudanic peoples had formed small monarchies ruled by kings who were viewed as divine or semidivine beings.
  11. ^ Liddell & Scott
  12. ^ "Polybius • Histories — Book 5".
  13. ^ The Arthasastra: Selections from the Classic Indian Work on Statecraft. Hackett Publishing. September 15, 2012. ISBN 9781603849029.
  14. ^ The Feminist Companion to Literature in English, ed. Virginia Blain, Patricia Clements and Isobel Grundy, (London: Batsford, 1990), p. 272.
  15. ^ Bohn, H. G. (1849). The Standard Library Cyclopedia of Political, Constitutional, Statistical and Forensic Knowledge. p. 640. A republic, according to the modern usage of the word, signifies a political community which is not under monarchical government ... in which one person does not possess the entire sovereign power.
  16. ^ "Definition of Republic". Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Retrieved February 18, 2017. a government having a chief of state who is not a monarch ... a government in which supreme power resides in a body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives responsible to them and governing according to law
  17. ^ "The definition of republic". Dictionary.com. Retrieved February 18, 2017. a state in which the supreme power rests in the body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by representatives chosen directly or indirectly by them. ... a state in which the head of government is not a monarch or other hereditary head of state.
  18. ^ Mansourov, Alexandre. "Korean Monarch Kim Jong Il: Technocrat Ruler of the Hermit Kingdom Facing the Challenge of Modernity". The Nautilus Institute. Archived from the original on September 22, 2013. Retrieved December 18, 2007.
  19. ^ W. Veenendaal, "Monarchy and Democracy in Small States: An Ambiguous Symbiosis," in S. Wolf, ed., State Size Matters: Politik und Recht I'm Kontext von Kleinstaatlichkeit und Monarchie (Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2016), pp. 183–198, doi:10.1007/978-3-658-07725-9_9, ISBN 978-3-658-07724-2.
  20. ^ "Seven myths about democracy in Morocco".
  21. ^ "Thailand's king seeks to bring back absolute monarchy". The Economist.
  22. ^ "Qatar - Politics, Economy, Society | Britannica".
  23. ^ Bertolini, Elisa (December 23, 2024). Hood, Laura (ed.). "Europe's microstates: The medieval monarchies that survive in our midst". doi:10.64628/AB.qaqpc5xh5.
  24. ^ Gerring, John; Wig, Tore; Veenendaal, Wouter; Weitzel, Daniel; Teorell, Jan; Kikuta, Kyosuke (2020). "Why Monarchy? The Rise and Demise of a Regime Type". Comparative Political Studies. 54 (3–4): 585–622. doi:10.1177/0010414020938090. hdl:10852/84589. ISSN 0010-4140. S2CID 225612565.
  25. ^ Lawrence, Adria (2023). "Why Monarchies Still Reign". Journal of Democracy. 34 (2): 47–61. doi:10.1353/jod.2023.0017. ISSN 1086-3214. S2CID 258184108.
  26. ^ UCL (November 8, 2021). "What is the role of the monarchy?". The Constitution Unit. Retrieved February 28, 2023.
  27. ^ Beemer, Cristy (2011). "The Female Monarchy: A Rhetorical Strategy of Early Modern Rule". Rhetoric Review. 30 (3): 258–274. doi:10.1080/07350198.2011.581937. ISSN 0735-0198. JSTOR 23064026. S2CID 144455583.
  28. ^ "The Definition of an Elective Monarchy". The Classroom | Empowering Students in Their College Journey. Retrieved August 30, 2021.
  29. ^ Marlowe, Lara. "The Central African Republic, where Emperor Bokassa ruled with violence and greed". The Irish Times. Retrieved February 5, 2019.
  30. ^ Spence, Jonathan D. (1999) The Search for Modern China, W.W. Norton and Company. p. 274. ISBN 0-393-97351-4.
  31. ^ Anckar, Carsten; Akademi, Åbo (2016). "Semi presidential systems and semi constitutional monarchies: A historical assessment of executive power-sharing". European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR). Retrieved August 14, 2019.
  32. ^ Kurrild-Klitgaard, Peter (2000). "The constitutional economics of autocratic succession". Public Choice. 103 (1/2): 63–84. doi:10.1023/A:1005078532251. ISSN 0048-5829. S2CID 154097838.
  33. ^ Kurrild-Klitgaard, Peter (2004). "Autocratic Succession". The Encyclopedia of Public Choice. Vol. 103. pp. 358–362. doi:10.1007/978-0-306-47828-4_39. ISBN 978-0-306-47828-4.
  34. ^ a b Tronföljd, Nordisk familjebok, vol. 30 (1920)
  35. ^ SOU 1977:5 Kvinnlig tronföljd, p. 16.
  36. ^ SOU 1977:5 Kvinnlig tronföljd, p. 16.
  37. ^ "Overturning Centuries of Royal Rules" (2011-10-28). BBC.com. Retrieved 2018-11-02.
  38. ^ "New rules on royal succession come into effect". BBC News. March 26, 2015. Retrieved August 1, 2019.
  39. ^ Chara, Jihan (October 1, 2018). "Saudi Arabia: A prince's revolution". European View. 17 (2): 227–234. doi:10.1177/1781685818803525. ISSN 1781-6858.
  40. ^ "Is Power Trumping Legitimacy in Saudi Arabia?". April 20, 2022.
  41. ^ Middleton, John (2015). World monarchies and dynasties. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-7656-8050-1. OCLC 920786632.
  42. ^ "How is a New Pope Chosen? | USCCB".
  43. ^ Nohlen, Dieter; Grotz, Florian; Hartmann, Christof (November 15, 2001). Elections in Asia and the Pacific : A Data Handbook: Volume II: South East Asia, East Asia, and the South Pacific. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-153042-5.
  44. ^ Gendźwiłł, Adam; Kjaer, Ulrik; Steyvers, Kristof (February 27, 2022). The Routledge Handbook of Local Elections and Voting in Europe. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-000-53122-0.
  45. ^ Herodotus, The Histories Book 3, 61–79
  46. ^ "Realms and Commonwealth". The Royal Family.
  47. ^ a b "Andorra: Freedom in the World 2024 Country Report".
  48. ^ "Belgium – EU country profile | European Union".
  49. ^ "Denmark - Politics, Constitution, Monarchy | Britannica".
  50. ^ "Spain | History, Map, Flag, Population, Currency, Climate, & Facts | Britannica".
  51. ^ Bertolini, E. (2024, December 23). Europe’s microstates: The medieval monarchies that survive in our midst. The Conversation.
  52. ^ Bertolini, E. (2024, December 23). Europe’s microstates: The medieval monarchies that survive in our midst. The Conversation.
  53. ^ Bertolini, E. (2024, December 23). Europe’s microstates: The medieval monarchies that survive in our midst. The Conversation.
  54. ^ Jung, Dietrich (March 24, 2017). Muslim History and Social Theory: A Global Sociology of Modernity. Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-52608-9.
  55. ^ "Not all monarchs have lost power. Here are a few countries where royals really rule". Los Angeles Times. May 4, 2019.
  56. ^ "A Visitor's Guide to Oman, the Middle East's Most Welcoming Absolute Monarchy". Vanity Fair. May 5, 2014.
  57. ^ Xavier, Constantino (July 8, 2020). "Bhutan's democratic transition and ties to India". Brookings. Retrieved April 16, 2022.
  58. ^ Cartwright, Mark (July 10, 2019). "Emperor of Japan". World History Encyclopedia. Retrieved April 16, 2022.
  59. ^ Africa Research Bulletin: Political, Social and Cultural Series. 36 (1). February 22, 1999. doi:10.1111/arbp.1999.36.issue-1. ISSN 0001-9844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/arbp.1999.36.issue-1. {{cite journal}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  60. ^ "BTI 2022 Eswatini Country Report". BTI 2022. Retrieved November 12, 2023.
  61. ^ Thom, Liezl (April 28, 2021). "Princess Sikhanyiso Dlamini of Eswatini is looking to the future while embracing her roots". ABC News. Retrieved August 8, 2021.
  62. ^ Marans, Noam E. (April 9, 2015). "The Pope Francis Effect and Catholic-Jewish Relations". Studies in Christian-Jewish Relations. 10 (1). doi:10.6017/scjr.v10i1.8659. ISSN 1930-3777.
  63. ^ "Holy See (Vatican City)", The World Factbook, Central Intelligence Agency, November 1, 2023, retrieved November 12, 2023
  64. ^ Drage, Jean (1994). New Politics in the South pacific. Institute of Pacific Studies, University of the South Pacific. p. 162. ISBN 9789820201156. Retrieved April 11, 2010.
  65. ^ Young W. Kihl, Hong Nack Kim. North Korea: The Politics of Regime Survival. Armonk, New York, USA: M. E. Sharpe, Inc., 2006. Pp 56.
  66. ^ Robert A. Scalapino, Chong-Sik Lee. The Society. University of California Press, 1972. Pp. 689.
  67. ^ Bong Youn Choy. A history of the Korean reunification movement: its issues and prospects. Research Committee on Korean Reunification, Institute of International Studies, Bradley University, 1984. Pp. 117.
  68. ^ a b Sheridan, Michael (September 16, 2007). "A tale of two dictatorships: The links between North Korea and Syria". The Times. London. Archived from the original on February 19, 2008. Retrieved April 9, 2010.
  69. ^ The Twisted Logic of the N.Korean Regime, Chosun Ilbo, 2013-08-13, Accessed date: 2017-01-11
[edit]