Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity
In theoretical physics, Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity, also known as JT gravity or the R=T model, is a theory of gravity with a dilaton in one spatial and one time dimension (1+1D). It was first formulated by Roman Jackiw and Claudio Teitelboim. [1] The theory is notable for being a toy model of quantum gravity that is exactly solvable, and it has found applications in understanding near-extremal black holes and the AdS/CFT correspondence.[2] [3]
The dynamics of JT gravity in the bulk are relatively simple, leading to a constant negative curvature spacetime (Anti-de Sitter space). [4] However, the theory possesses interesting dynamics on the boundary of this spacetime, which are described by the Schwarzian theory.[5]This boundary theory captures the low-energy behavior of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev (SYK) model, a model of quantum chaos.[2]
Action
[edit]The action for Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity is defined on a 2-dimensional manifold M with a metric gμν and a dilaton field Φ. It is given by:
where GN is the two-dimensional Newton constant, R is the Ricci scalar of the metric gμν, and the cosmological constant is chosen such that the equations of motion fix the spacetime to be constantly curved.
Boundary Terms
[edit]For a manifold M with a boundary ∂M, it is necessary to include boundary terms in the action to have a well-posed variational problem. [6] The appropriate boundary terms for JT gravity are a Gibbons-Hawking-York (GHY) term for the metric and a corresponding term for the dilaton field:
Here, h is the induced metric on the boundary, K is the extrinsic curvature, and Φb is the value of the dilaton at the boundary.[7] The second term is a counterterm that normalizes the action. [8]
The full action for Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity with boundary is therefore:
Schwarzian Boundary Theory
[edit]A key feature of JT gravity is that its dynamics can be reduced to a theory on the one-dimensional boundary of the two-dimensional spacetime. This is achieved by integrating out the bulk fields (the metric gμν and the dilaton Φ), leaving an effective action for the boundary degrees of freedom.[9] The resulting effective action is the Schwarzian action, which describes the reparametrizations of the boundary.
Derivation
[edit]The derivation of the Schwarzian boundary theory involves several steps:
- Solving the bulk equations of motion: Variation of the JT action with respect to the dilaton Φ imposes the constraint R = -2, which means the bulk geometry is a slice of Anti-de Sitter space (AdS2). The equation of motion for the metric connects it to the dilaton's stress-energy tensor.
- Gauge fixing and boundary conditions: A convenient gauge choice is to fix the metric to be of the form . The boundary of this space is located at z = ε for some small ε. The boundary curve is then parameterized by a time coordinate t(u), where u is a physical time on the boundary.
- Evaluating the on-shell action: The bulk term of the action vanishes on-shell due to the equation of motion for the dilaton. The entire action is then given by the boundary term, evaluated on the solutions to the equations of motion.
- The Schwarzian derivative: After carefully evaluating the boundary term with the imposed boundary conditions and gauge fixing, the action reduces to:
where C is a constant proportional to Φb/GN, β is the periodicity of the boundary time coordinate, and {f,u} denotes the Schwarzian derivative of a function f with respect to u:
This effective action for the boundary reparametrization t(u) is the renowned Schwarzian action. [11] This theory describes the spontaneous and explicit breaking of conformal symmetry on the boundary, a feature also seen in the low-energy limit of the SYK model.[2]
References
[edit]- ^ Jackiw, R. (1985). "Lower dimensional gravity". Nuclear Physics B. 252: 343–356. Bibcode:1985NuPhB.252..343J. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90448-1. Teitelboim, C. (1983). "Gravitation and Hamiltonian structure in two spacetime dimensions". Physics Letters B. 126 (1–2): 41–45. Bibcode:1983PhLB..126...41T. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90012-6.
- ^ a b c Maldacena, J.; Stanford, D.; Yang, Z. (2016). "Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space". Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics. 2016 (12): 12C104. arXiv:1606.01857. doi:10.1093/ptep/ptw124.
- ^ Almheiri, A.; Polchinski, J. (2015). "Models of AdS2 backreaction and holography". Journal of High Energy Physics. 2015 (11): 14. arXiv:1401.4480. doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2015)014.
- ^ Garcia-Garcia, A. M.; Godet, Victor (2021). "Euclidean wormhole in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model". Physics Review D. 103 (4) 046014. arXiv:2010.11633. Bibcode:2021PhRvD.103d6014G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.046014.
- ^ Iliesiu, Luca V. (2019). "On 2D gauge theories in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity". arXiv:1909.05253 [hep-th].
- ^ Regge, T.; Teitelboim, C. (1974). "Role of surface integrals in the Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity". Annals of Physics. 88 (2): 286–318. Bibcode:1974AnPhy..88..286R. doi:10.1016/0003-4916(74)90404-7.
- ^ Brown, J. D.; York, J. W. (1993). "Quasilocal energy and conserved charges derived from the gravitational action". Physical Review D. 47 (4): 1407–1419. arXiv:gr-qc/9209012. Bibcode:1993PhRvD..47.1407B. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.47.1407. PMID 10015717.
- ^ Brown, A.R.; Gharibyan, H.; Lin, H.W.; Susskind, Leonard; Thorlacius, Larus; Zhao, Ying (2019). "Complexity of Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity". Physical Review D. 99 (4): 046016. arXiv:1810.05109. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.046012.
- ^ Alkalaev, Konstantin; Joung, Euihun; Yoon, Junggi (2022). "Schwarzian for colored Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity". Journal of High Energy Physics (9) 160. arXiv:2204.09010. Bibcode:2022JHEP...09..160A. doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2022)160.
- ^ "Variation of action for Jackiw-Teitelboim (JT) gravity in order to get equations of motion".
- ^ Monti, Federico; Otness, Karl; Bronstein, Michael M. (2018). "The Schwarzian Theory - Origins". arXiv:1802.01572 [cs.LG].