Ford–GM 10-speed automatic transmission

Ford 10R 60 · 10R 80 · 10R 140
GM 10L 80 · 10L 90 GM 10L 1000 (Allison)
Overview
ManufacturerFord · General Motors
Production2017–present
Body and chassis
Class10-speed longitudinal automatic transmission
RelatedZF 8HP · MB 9G-Tronic
Chronology
PredecessorFord 6R 60 · 6R 80 · 6R 140
GM 8L 45 · 8L 90

The Ford–GM 10-speed automatic transmission is part of a joint venture between Ford Motor Company and General Motors to design and engineer two transmissions: a longitudinal 10-speed transmission and a transverse 9-speed trans-axle. Each company manufactures its own unique version of the transmissions in its own factories.[1][2] The 10-speed transmission was designed by Ford, while the 9-speed transmission was designed by GM.[3][4]

Gear Ratios[a]
Model Gear Total
Span
Span
Center
Avg.
Step
Compo-
nents
R 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Ford 10R 80 · 2017
GM 10L 80 · 2017
GM 10L 90 · 2018
−4.866 4.696 2.985 2.146 1.769 1.520 1.275 1.000 0.854 0.689 0.636 7.386 1.728 1.249 4
Gearsets
2
Brakes
4
Clutches
Ford
10R 140 · 2020
−4.695 4.615 2.919 2.132 1.773 1.519 1.277 1.000 0.851 0.687 0.632 7.299 1.708 1.247
GM 10L 1000
(Allison) · 2020
−4.545 4.538 2.868 2.061 1.715 1.482 1.258 1.000 0.851 0.688 0.632 7.182 1.694 1.245
Ford 10R 60 · 2020 −4.885 4.714 2.997 2.149 1.769 1.521 1.275 1.000 0.853 0.689 0.636 7.416 1.731 1.249
  1. ^ Differences in gear ratios have a measurable, direct impact on vehicle dynamics, performance, waste emissions as well as fuel mileage

Production

[edit]

The 10R 80 was first produced at the Ford Livonia Transmission Plant in Livonia, Michigan, and the Hydra-Matic 10L 80 is made at the General Motors Romulus Powertrain Plant, in Romulus, Michigan.[5] GM's Silao, Mexico, transmission plant started 10L 80 production in 2018,[6] while Ford's Sharonville Transmission plant started 10R 80 production in 2018.[7]

Specifications

[edit]

Gearset Concept: New Paradigm For Improved Cost-Effectiveness

[edit]
Gearset Concept: Cost-Effectiveness[a]
With
Assessment
Output:
Gear
Ratios
Innovation
Elasticity[b]
Δ Output : Δ Input
Input: Main Components
Total Gearsets Brakes Clutches
10R & 10L
Ref. Object

Topic[b]



Δ Number
Relative Δ Δ Output

Δ Input
GM 10L
GM 8L[c]
10[d]
8[d]
Progress
General Motors[b]
10
9
4
4
2
2
4
3
Δ Number 2 1 0 0 1
Relative Δ 0.250
2.250[b]
0.111
0.000
0.000
0.333
Ford 10R
Ford 6R[c]
10[d]
6[d]
Progress
Ford[b]
10
8
4
3
2
2
4
3
Δ Number 4 2 1 0 1
Relative Δ 0.667
2.667[b]
0.250
0.333
0.000
0.333
10R & 10L
8HP[e]
10[d]
8[d]
Current
Market Position[b]
10
8
4
4
2
2
4
3
Δ Number 2 1 0 0 1
Relative Δ 0.250
2.250[b]
0.111
0.000
0.000
0.333
10R & 10L
3-Speed[f]
10[d]
3[d]
Historical
Market Position[b]
10
7
4
2
2
3
4
2
Δ Number 7 3 2 -1 2
Relative Δ 2.333
5.444[b]
0.429
1.000
−0.333
1.000
  1. ^ Progress increases cost-effectiveness and is reflected in the ratio of forward gears to main components.
    It depends on the power flow:
    • parallel: using the two degrees of freedom of planetary gearsets
      • to increase the number of gears
      • with unchanged number of components
    • serial: in-line combined planetary gearsets without using the two degrees of freedom
      • to increase the number of gears
      • a corresponding increase in the number of components is unavoidable
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Innovation Elasticity Classifies Progress And Market Position
    • Automobile manufacturers drive forward technical developments primarily in order to remain competitive or to achieve or defend technological leadership. This technical progress has therefore always been subject to economic constraints
    • Only innovations whose relative additional benefit is greater than the relative additional resource input, i.e. whose economic elasticity is greater than 1, are considered for realization
    • The required innovation elasticity of an automobile manufacturer depends on its expected return on investment. The basic assumption that the relative additional benefit must be at least twice as high as the relative additional resource input helps with orientation
      • negative, if the output increases and the input decreases, is perfect
      • 2 or above is good
      • 1 or above is acceptable (red)
      • below this is unsatisfactory (bold)
  3. ^ a b Direct Predecessor
    • To reflect the progress of the specific model change
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h plus 1 reverse gear
  5. ^ Current Reference Standard (Benchmark)
    • The 8HP has become the new reference standard (benchmark) for automatic transmissions
  6. ^ Historical Reference Standard (Benchmark)
    • 3-speed transmissions with torque converters have established the modern market for automatic transmissions and thus made it possible in the first place, as this design proved to be a particularly successful compromise between cost and performance
    • It became the archetype and dominated the world market for around 3 decades, setting the standard for automatic transmissions. It was only when fuel consumption became the focus of interest that this design reached its limits, which is why it has now completely disappeared from the market
    • What has remained is the orientation that it offers as a reference standard (point of reference, benchmark) for this market for determining progressiveness and thus the market position of all other, later designs
    • All transmission variants consist of 7 main components
    • Typical examples are

Gearset Concept: Quality

[edit]

The transmission is based on the well-known 8-speed automatic transmission 8HP from ZF. A unique triple-clutch assembly on a dedicated intermediate shaft, placed in the middle of the architecture, replaces two ordinary clutches and is the key for packaging the 10-speed unit into the same space as the previous transmission.[8]

  • Compared to the 8-speed architecture
    • The transmission offers smaller steps between the lower gears
    • Which benefits acceleration at low speeds.
    • The transmission does not offer any significantly smaller steps between the upper gears
    • Where this is more important than in the lower gears.
    • The transmission does not offer any increase in the overall range.
  • The ratios of the 10 gears are
    • much more unevenly distributed than in the 8-speed architecture
    • and even more uneven than in the direct competitor 9G-Tronic from Mercedes-Benz.
    • The gear step from 9th to 10th gear is unfavorably small at less than 9%.

These weaknesses largely offset the advantage of the additional gears.

Gear Ratio Analysis
In-Depth Analysis
With Assessment[a]
Planetary Gearset: Teeth[b] Count Total[c]
Center[d]
Avg.[e]
Model
Type
Version
First Delivery
S1[f]
R1[g]
S2[h]
R2[i]
S3[j]
R3[k]
S4[l]
R4[m]
Brakes
Clutches
Ratio
Span
Gear
Step[n]
Gear
Ratio
R
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Step[n] [o] [p]
Δ Step[q][r]
Shaft
Speed
Δ Shaft
Speed[s]
Specific
Torque[t]
[u] [u] [u] [u] [u] [u] [u] [u] [u] [u] [u]
Efficiency
[t]
Ford 10R 80
GM 10L 80
GM 10L 90
800 N⋅m (590 lb⋅ft) · 2017[9]
900 N⋅m (664 lb⋅ft) · 2018
45
95
51
89[10]
73
119
23
85[10]
2
4
7.3864
1.7277
1.2488[n]
Gear
Ratio
−4.8661
4.6957
2.9851[r]
2.1462
1.7690[n][s]
1.5201[n][r][s]
1.2751[n][r]
1.0000[n]
0.8536[r][s]
0.6892
0.6357[s]
Step 1.0363 1.0000 1.5730 1.3909 1.2132[n] 1.1638[n] 1.1921[n] 1.2751[n] 1.1715 1.2386 1.0841
Δ Step[q] 1.1310[r] 1.1465 1.0425 0.9762[r] 0.9349[r] 1.0885 0.9458[r] 1.1425
Speed –0.9650 1.0000 1.5730 2.1879 2.6543 3.0890 3.6825 4.6956 5.5008 6.8134 7.3864
Δ Speed 0.9650 1.0000 0.5730 0.6148 0.4665[s] 0.4347[s] 0.5935 1.0131 0.8052[s] 1.3126 0.5730[s]
Specific
Torque[t]
–4.6591
–4.5573
4.6217
4.5848
2.9164
2.8821
2.1201
2.1071
1.7440
1.7316
1.5054
1.4980
1.2624
1.2559
1.0000 0.8489
0.8465
0.6839
0.6812
0.6310
0.6286
Efficiency
[t]
0.9575
0.9365
0.9843
0.9764
0.9770
0.9655
0.9879
0.9818
0.9858
0.9788
0.9903
0.9855
0.9900
0.9850
1.0000 0.9945
0.9917
0.9924
0.9885
0.9926
0.9889
Ford
10R 140
1,400 N⋅m (1,033 lb⋅ft) · 2020[11] 58
122
50
86
69
111
26
94
2
4
7.2987
1.7084
1.2471[n]
Gear
Ratio
−4.6951
4.6154
2.9186
2.1319
1.7733[n][s]
1.5188[n][r][s]
1.2773[n][r]
1.0000[n]
0.8514[r][s]
0.6871
0.6324[s]
Step 1.0173 1.0000 1.5814 1.3690 1.2022[n] 1.1676[n] 1.1891[n] 1.2773[n] 1.1746 1.2391 1.0866
Δ Step[q] 1.1551 1.1388 1.0297 0.9819[r] 0.9310[r] 1.0874 0.9479[r] 1.1404
Speed –0.9830 1.0000 1.5814 2.1650 2.6027 3.0388 3.6135 4.6154 5.4211 6.7174 7.2987
Δ Speed 0.9830 1.0000 0.5814 0.5836 0.4377[s] 0.4360[s] 0.5747 1.0019 0.8058[s] 1.2962 0.5814[s]
Specific
Torque[t]
–4.4953
–4.3972
4.5431
4.5069
2.8514
2.8179
2.1061
2.0931
1.7482
1.7357
1.5041
1.4967
1.2644
1.2579
1.0000 0.8466
0.8442
0.6818
0.6791
0.6276
0.6252
Efficiency
[t]
0.9575
0.9366
0.9843
0.9765
0.9770
0.9655
0.9879
0.9818
0.9858
0.9788
0.9903
0.9854
0.9899
0.9848
1.0000 0.9944
0.9916
0.9923
0.9883
0.9926
0.9888
GM 10L 1000
(Allison)
1,400 N⋅m (1,033 lb⋅ft) · 2020[12] 53
103
53
91
65
103
26
92
2
4
7.1817
1.6935
1.2449[n]
Gear
Ratio
−4.5448
4.5385
2.8681[r]
2.0609
1.7153[n][s]
1.4817[n][r][s]
1.2583[n][r]
1.0000[n]
0.8506[r][s]
0.6877
0.6319[s]
Step 1.0014 1.0000 1.5824 1.3916 1.2015[n] 1.1576[n] 1.1776[n] 1.2583[n] 1.1757 1.2368 1.0883
Δ Step[q] 1.1371[r] 1.1583 1.0379 0.9830[r] 0.9358[r] 1.0703 0.9506[r] 1.1365
Speed –0.9986 1.0000 1.5824 2.2022 2.6459 3.0629 3.6068 4.5386 5.3358 6.5993 7.1817
Δ Speed 0.9986 1.0000 0.5824 0.6198 0.4437[s] 0.4170[s] 0.5439 0.9317 0.7974[s] 1.2635 0.5824[s]
Specific
Torque[t]
–4.3517
–4.2569
4.4677
4.4323
2.8023
2.7694
2.0362
2.0239
1.6920
1.6805
1.4679
1.4610
1.2459
1.2396
1.0000 0.8458
0.8434
0.6824
0.6797
0.6272
0.6248
Efficiency
[t]
0.9575
0.9366
0.9844
0.9766
0.9771
0.9656
0.9880
0.9820
0.9865
0.9797
0.9907
0.9860
0.9902
0.9852
1.0000 0.9944
0.9915
0.9923
0.9883
0.9925
0.9887
Ford 10R 60 600 N⋅m (443 lb⋅ft) · 2020[13] 45
95
51
89[10]
73
119
28
104
2
4
7.4157
1.7312
1.2493[n]
Gear
Ratio
−4.8854
4.7143
2.9969[r]
2.1488
1.7690[n][s]
1.5209[n][r][s]
1.2755[n][r]
1.0000[n]
0.8535[r][s]
0.6890
0.6357[s]
Step 1.0363 1.0000 1.5730 1.3947 1.2147[n] 1.1631[n] 1.1924[n] 1.2755[n] 1.1717 1.2389 1.0837
Δ Step[q] 1.1279[r] 1.1482 1.0443 0.9754[r] 0.9349[r] 1.0886 0.9458[r] 1.1431
Speed –0.9650 1.0000 1.5730 2.1979 2.6648 3.0996 3.6961 4.7143 5.5235 6.8143 7.4157
Δ Speed 0.9650 1.0000 0.5730 0.6208 0.4710[s] 0.4347[s] 0.5965 1.0182 0.8092[s] 1.3192 0.5730[s]
Specific
Torque[t]
–4.6775
–4.5753
4.6400
4.6029
2.9279
2.8935
2.1227
2.1096
1.7440
1.7316
1.5062
1.4989
1.2627
1.2563
1.0000 0.8488
0.8464
0.6837
0.6810
0.6310
0.6286
Efficiency
[t]
0.9574
0.9365
0.9842
0.9764
0.9770
0.9655
0.9878
0.9818
0.9858
0.9788
0.9903
0.9855
0.9900
0.9850
1.0000 0.9945
0.9917
0.9924
0.9885
0.9926
0.9889
Actuated Shift Elements[v]
Brake A[w]
Brake B[x]
Clutch C[y]
Clutch D[z] (❶)
Clutch E[aa]
Clutch F[ab]
Gears Using ZF 8HP Logic And New Gears
ZF 8HP R 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
10R & 10L New 1 2 3 4 New New 7 New New 10
Geometric Ratios
Ratio
R–2 & 10
Ordinary[ac]
Elementary
Noted[ad]
Ratio
3–4 & 9
Ordinary[ac]
Elementary
Noted[ad]
Ratio
5 & 8
Elementary
Noted[ad]
Ratio
6 & 7
Ordinary[ac]
Elementary
Noted[ad]
Kinetic Ratios
Specific
Torque[t]
R–2 & 10
Specific
Torque[t]
3–4 & 9
Specific
Torque[t]
5 & 8
Specific
Torque[t]
6 & 7
  1. ^ Revised 14 October 2025
  2. ^ Layout
    • Input and output are on opposite sides
    • Planetary gearset 1 is on the input (turbine) side
    • Input shafts are C2 (planetary gear carrier of gearset 2) and, if actuated, R3 and S4
    • Output shaft is C4 (planetary gear carrier of gearset 4)
  3. ^ Total Ratio Span (Total Ratio Spread · Total Gear Ratio)
    • A wider span enables the
      • downspeeding when driving outside the city limits
      • increase the climbing ability
        • when driving over mountain passes or off-road
        • or when towing a trailer
  4. ^ Ratio Span's Center
    • The center indicates the speed level of the transmission
    • Together with the final drive ratio
    • it gives the shaft speed level of the vehicle
  5. ^ Average Gear Step
    • With decreasing step width
      • the gears connect better to each other
      • shifting comfort increases
  6. ^ Sun 1: sun gear of gearset 1
  7. ^ Ring 1: ring gear of gearset 1
  8. ^ Sun 2: sun gear of gearset 2
  9. ^ Ring 2: ring gear of gearset 2
  10. ^ Sun 3: sun gear of gearset 3
  11. ^ Ring 3: ring gear of gearset 3
  12. ^ Sun 4: sun gear of gearset 4
  13. ^ Ring 4: ring gear of gearset 4
  14. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al Standard 50:50
    — 50 % Is Above And 50 % Is Below The Average Gear Step —
    • With steadily decreasing gear steps (yellow highlighted line Step)
    • and a particularly large step from 1st to 2nd gear
      • the lower half of the gear steps (between the small gears; rounded down, here the first 4) is always larger
      • and the upper half of the gear steps (between the large gears; rounded up, here the last 5) is always smaller
    • than the average gear step (cell highlighted yellow two rows above on the far right)
    • lower half: smaller gear steps are a waste of possible ratios (red bold)
    • upper half: larger gear steps are unsatisfactory (red bold)
  15. ^ Standard R:1
    — Reverse And 1st Gear Have The Same Ratio —
    • The ideal reverse gear has the same transmission ratio as 1st gear
      • no impairment when maneuvering
      • especially when towing a trailer
      • a torque converter can only partially compensate for this deficiency
    • Plus 11.11 % minus 10 % compared to 1st gear is good
    • Plus 25 % minus 20 % is acceptable (red)
    • Above this is unsatisfactory (bold)
  16. ^ Standard 1:2
    — Gear Step 1st To 2nd Gear As Small As Possible —
    • With continuously decreasing gear steps (yellow marked line Step)
    • the largest gear step is the one from 1st to 2nd gear, which
      • for a good speed connection and
      • a smooth gear shift
    • must be as small as possible
      • A gear ratio of up to 1.6667 : 1 (5 : 3) is good
      • Up to 1.7500 : 1 (7 : 4) is acceptable (red)
      • Above is unsatisfactory (bold)
  17. ^ a b c d e From large to small gears (from right to left)
  18. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae Standard STEP
    — From Large To Small Gears: Steady And Progressive Increase In Gear Steps —
    • Gear steps should
      • increase: Δ Step (first green highlighted line Δ Step) is always greater than 1
      • As progressive as possible: Δ Step is always greater than the previous step
    • Not progressively increasing is acceptable (red)
    • Not increasing is unsatisfactory (bold)
  19. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag Standard SPEED
    — From Small To Large Gears: Steady Increase In Shaft Speed Difference —
    • Shaft speed differences should
      • increase: Δ Shaft Speed (second line marked in green Δ (Shaft) Speed) is always greater than the previous one
    • 1 difference smaller than the previous one is acceptable (red)
    • 2 consecutive ones are a waste of possible ratios (bold)
  20. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Specific Torque Ratio And Efficiency
    • The specific torque is the Ratio of
      • output torque
      • to input torque
      • with
    • The efficiency is calculated from the specific torque in relation to the transmission ratio
    • Power loss for single meshing gears is in the range of 1 % to 1.5 %
      • helical gear pairs, which are used to reduce noise in passenger cars, are in the upper part of the loss range
      • spur gear pairs, which are limited to commercial vehicles due to their poorer noise comfort, are in the lower part of the loss range
  21. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Corridor for specific torque and efficiency
    • in planetary gearsets, the stationary gear ratio is formed via the planetary gears and thus by two meshes
    • for reasons of simplification, the efficiency for both meshes together is commonly specified there
    • the efficiencies specified here are based on assumed efficiencies for the stationary ratio
      • of (upper value)
      • and (lower value)
    • for both interventions together
    • The corresponding efficiency for single-meshing gear pairs is
      • at (upper value)
      • and (lower value)
  22. ^ Permanently coupled elements
    • S1 and S2
    • C1 (carrier 1) and R4
    • R2 and S3
    • R3 and S4
  23. ^ Blocks s1
  24. ^ Blocks R1
  25. ^ Couples R2 and S3 with the dedicated intermediate shaft
  26. ^ Couples C3 (carrier 3) with the dedicated intermediate shaft
  27. ^ Couples R3 and S4 with the input shaft
  28. ^ Couples C1 (carrier 1) and R4 with the dedicated intermediate shaft
  29. ^ a b c Ordinary Noted
    • For direct determination of the ratio
  30. ^ a b c d Elementary Noted
    • Alternative representation for determining the transmission ratio
    • Contains only operands
      • With simple fractions of both central gears of a planetary gearset
      • Or with the value 1
    • As a basis
      • For reliable
      • And traceable
    • Determination of specific torque and efficiency

Applications

[edit]

Ford

[edit]

10R 60

[edit]

10R 80 MHT

[edit]

10R 80

[edit]

10R 100

[edit]
  • 2023–present Ford Super Duty
    • Marketed as TorqShift-G
    • 6.8L Gasoline engine only
    • non-Tremor 7.3L Gasoline on 2025-present

10R 140

[edit]
  • 2020–present Ford Super Duty
    • Marketed as TorqShift
    • 6.7L Diesel and 7.3L Gasoline on 2023-2024
    • Tremor 7.3L Gasoline on 2025-present

General Motors

[edit]

Source[14]

10L 60

[edit]

10L 80 MF6

[edit]

10L 90 MX0

[edit]

10L 1000 (Allison) MGM · MGU

[edit]

Lawsuits

[edit]

At least five class action lawsuits have been filed regarding vehicles equipped with Ford's 10R 80 transmission.[16][17][18][19][20] Several have since been consolidated to a single case being heard in Illinois.[19] The lawsuits allege safety issues due to harsh and erratic shifting, which causes jerking, lunging, clunking and hesitation between gears.[17][19] At least one case also cites sudden loss of power due to transmission issues.[17] It is also alleged that Ford is aware of these issues and re-designed the CDF hub inner sleeve along with publishing several TSBs related to the concern.

McCabe v. Ford Motor Company cites 38 different NHTSA complaints regarding the 10R 80 transmission. The complaints encompass the 2019–2022 Ford Ranger, 2018–2021 Ford Expedition, 2018–2022 Ford Mustang, 2018–2021 Lincoln Navigator, and 2021 Ford F-150.[17]

Some of the lawsuits have been dismissed or partially dismissed.[21][22] As of October 2023, at least one of these lawsuits is still ongoing.

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Ford and GM finally consummate 9- and 10-speed joint development - SAE International". articles.sae.org. Archived from the original on 2018-03-25. Retrieved 2018-03-24.
  2. ^ "Timur Apakidze · Exclusive: An Inside Look At Ford's New 10 Speed Transmission". TTAC · The Truth About Cars. 2014-12-01. Retrieved 2018-03-24.
  3. ^ Martinez, Michael (20 April 2018). "No thanks, Ford says to 9-speed offered by GM". Automotive News. Retrieved 8 July 2019.
  4. ^ Tracy, David (23 April 2018). "Why Ford Isn't Using GM's Nine-Speed Automatic Transmission". Jalopnik. Retrieved 8 July 2019.
  5. ^ Ford 10R80, GM 10L80 10 Speed Transmission - 10R80, 10L80 10 Speed Automatic Transmission Specs
  6. ^ Game of chicken: GM bets on Mexican-made pickup trucks
  7. ^ "New Programs Update May 2017". @FordOnline. Ford. Retrieved 10 March 2019.
  8. ^ "Holy Shift! A Look inside GM's new 10-Speed Automatic - Advanced design, GM control system support capability, enhanced efficiency". media.gm.com. May 11, 2016. Archived from the original on 2016-05-17.
  9. ^ "F150Hub: Ford 10R80 Automatic Transmission Specs, Ratios". Retrieved 15 July 2019.
  10. ^ a b c "Timur Apakidze · Saturation Dive: Ford 10 Speed Transmission Power Flow". TTAC · The Truth About Cars. 2014-12-23. Retrieved 2024-01-25.
  11. ^ "F450-XL Hub: Ford 10R140 Automatic Transmission Specs 2020, Ratios". Retrieved 5 June 2020.
  12. ^ "GMC Sierra HD Specs 2020, Ratios". Retrieved 7 June 2020.
  13. ^ "Ford Explorer Specs 2020, Ratios" (PDF). Retrieved 18 June 2023.
  14. ^ "GM Global Propulsion Systems – USA Information Guide Model Year 2018" (PDF). General Motors Powertrain. Retrieved 6 February 2019.
  15. ^ https://web.archive.org/web/20230512213219/https://i.imgur.com/S9il0A8.png [bare URL image file]
  16. ^ https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/FordCA.pdf. Smith v. Ford Motor Company. Case 5:20-cv-00211. Document 1. Retrieved 27 October 2023.
  17. ^ a b c d https://www.classaction.org/media/mccabe-v-ford-motor-company.pdf. McCabe v. Ford Motor Company. Case 1:23-cv-10829. Document 1. Retrieved 27 October 2023.
  18. ^ https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCOURTS-paed-2_20-cv-00247/pdf/USCOURTS-paed-2_20-cv-00247-0.pdf. Orndorff v Ford Motor Company. Case 2:20-cv-00247-KSM. Document 13. Retrieved 27 October 2023.
  19. ^ a b c https://app.ediscoveryassistant.com/case_law/51364-o-connor-v-ford-motor-co. O'Connor v Ford Motor Co. Case 1:19-cv-05045. Document Filed: July 20, 2023. Retrieved 27 October 2023.
  20. ^ https://www.classaction.org/media/o-connor-v-ford-motor-company.pdf. O'Connor v Ford Motor Co. Case 1:19-cv-05045.Document 7. Filed 8 August 2019. Retrieved 27 October 2023.
  21. ^ Foote, Brett (17 November 2020). "FORD F-150 10R 80 TRANSMISSION LAWSUIT DISMISSED IN ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT". Ford Authority. Retrieved 27 October 2023.
  22. ^ Foote, Brett (8 November 2021). "FORD F-150 10R80 TRANSMISSION LAWSUIT SURVIVES PARTIAL DISMISSAL". Ford Authority.
[edit]