Fatou–Bieberbach domain

In mathematics, a Fatou–Bieberbach domain is a proper subdomain of , biholomorphically equivalent to . That is, an open set is called a Fatou–Bieberbach domain if there exists a biholomorphic function whose inverse function is holomorphic.

History

[edit]

As a consequence of the Riemann mapping theorem, there are no Fatou–Bieberbach domains in the case n = 1. Pierre Fatou and Ludwig Bieberbach first explored such domains in higher dimensions in the 1920s, hence the name given to them later. Since the 1980s, Fatou–Bieberbach domains have again become the subject of mathematical research.

Examples

[edit]

Fatou–Bieberbach domains occur in great numbers for .

Let denote the group of biholomorphisms of type . Basins of attractions produce many FB domains, according to the following theorem.

Theorem ((Rosay & Rudin 1988))Suppose that fixes a point and that all eigenvalues of satisfy . Let be the set of all for which where . Then there exists a biholomorphic map from onto .

  • Let with spectral radius . Set . This is a contraction map with basin .
  • In , let with . Then . It has two fixed points: . The point is fixed and has eigenvalues . The basin is a proper open subset of and thus a Fatou–Bieberbach domain.
  • More generally, for , where , and a polynomial with all monomials having degree at least 2. The basin of attraction of is a Fatou–Bieberbach domain in . These maps are called complex Hénon maps.[1]

More generally, for any and any atttractive fixed point , let be its basin of attraction. If is not all of , then it is a Fatou–Bieberbach domain. It is also a Runge subset.[2] It was an open problem for a long time whether there exists Fatou–Bieberbach domains that are not Runge. This was answered in the affirmative in 2008.[3]

Let be countably many complex-affine subspaces of . There exists a Fatou–Bieberbach domain such that is a connected proper subset of for all .[4]

Given countably many closed subvarieties of . There exists a Fatou–Bieberbach domain that contains all of them.[4]

The boundary of a Fatou–Bieberbach can be very wild. For any there exists disjoint Fatou–Bieberbach domains , such that , is on the boundary of all . Similar to lakes of Wada.[4]

The Andersén–Lempert theorem states that the group generated by shearing maps is dense in . This allows construction of many Fatou–Bieberbach domains.[2]

Properties

[edit]

No Fatou–Bieberbach domain is bounded, since a bounded image of an entire map would violate Liouville's theorem componentwise.

By the Ax–Grothendieck theorem, if is Fatou–Bieberbach, then for any biholomorphism , is not a polynomial.

Biholomorphism preserves Fatou–Bieberbach domains. That is, if and is Fatou–Bieberbach, then is Fatou–Bieberbach.

In one dimension, there are no Fatou–Bieberbach domains, due to Picard's great theorem.

Proof

Let be open, and be biholomorphic. Then is entire and injective. If were an essential singularity of , Picard implies is dense near every value with at most one exception, contradicting injectivity. Hence is a pole or removable, so is polynomial. Since it is injective, it must be affine with , so .

Being biholomorphic to , every Fatou–Bieberbach domain is a Stein manifold and a domain of holomorphy.

For any that is both Runge and Fatou–Bieberbach, for any , there exists a sequence of biholomorphisms such that they all fix , and [4]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Fornæss, John Erik; Sibony, Nessim (1992-02-01). "Complex Hénon mappings in ℂ2 and Fatou-Bieberbach domains". Duke Mathematical Journal. 65 (2). doi:10.1215/S0012-7094-92-06515-X. ISSN 0012-7094.
  2. ^ a b Forstnerič, F.; Kutzschebauch, F. (2022-06-01). "The First Thirty Years of Andersén-Lempert Theory". Analysis Mathematica. 48 (2): 489–544. arXiv:2111.08802. doi:10.1007/s10476-022-0130-1. ISSN 1588-273X.
  3. ^ Wold, Erlend Fornæss (2008-04-01). "A Fatou–Bieberbach domain in $$\mathbb {C}^2$$which is not Runge". Mathematische Annalen. 340 (4): 775–780. doi:10.1007/s00208-007-0168-1. ISSN 1432-1807.
  4. ^ a b c d Wold, Erlend FornæSs (November 2005). "Fatou–Bieberbach domains". International Journal of Mathematics. 16 (10): 1119–1130. doi:10.1142/S0129167X05003235. ISSN 0129-167X.
  • Fatou, Pierre (1922). "Sur les fonctions méromorphes de deux variables. Sur certains fonctions uniformes de deux variables" [On meromorphic functions of two variables. On certain uniform functions of two variables]. Comptes rendus de l'Académie des sciences (in French). 175.
  • Bieberbach, Ludwig (1933). "Beispiel zweier ganzer Funktionen zweier komplexer Variablen, welche eine schlichte volumtreue Abbildung des auf einen Teil seiner selbst vermitteln" [Example of two entire functions of two complex variables which provide a biholomorphic volume-preserving mapping of onto a part of itself]. Sitzungsberichte der Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften (in German).
  • Rosay, Jean-Pierre; Rudin, Walter (1988). "Holomorphic Maps from $C^n$ to $C^n$". Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. 310 (1): 47–86. doi:10.2307/2001110. ISSN 0002-9947. JSTOR 2001110.