Draft talk:Optical Pooled Screening

needs more secondary citations

[edit]

I am a new editor and subject matter expert working on this article and have been looking at the Perturb-seq article as an example.  The talk page there has a comment about too much reliance on primary citations and I think this draft does too. ProfessorBioTech (talk) 02:25, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Collaborator

[edit]

Hi -- I am happy to collaborate on this, if anyone is interested. it appears the other editors who started this project left(?). It seems like most of the work needs proper citations, and there needs to be sectional organization and new content. Zamphere (talk) 22:31, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Zamphere - the more the merrier! IMO additional secondary citations would be helpful ProfessorBioTech (talk) 13:01, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]