Draft talk:Alexandra Eschmeyer

This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Women's sport This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. Basketball This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Basketball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Basketball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Biography Biography portal This draft is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.

Notability and Draft Context for Alexandra Eschmeyer

Notability and Draft Context

I have created this draft article for Alexandra Eschmeyer, a highly ranked American women's basketball player in the Stanford Cardinal 2025 recruiting class. The draft focuses on verifiable achievements that may establish notability under Wikipedia guidelines:

• Named a McDonald's All-American, a nationally recognized honor for top high school basketball players.
• Represented the United States on youth national teams, including participation in the FIBA U17 Women’s World Cup.
• Ranked among the top 50 recruits nationally in her class by ESPN and other independent recruiting services.

The article currently includes a basic infobox, sections for early life/high school career, and college career. References have been added for national recognition and recruiting rankings. Additional coverage from reliable, independent sources will be added as it becomes available.

This draft is intended to be a neutral, verifiable starting point and is open to constructive feedback from reviewers, particularly regarding sources, structure, or any other improvements needed to meet Wikipedia’s standards for a standalone article. MikePascoe (talk) 01:01, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]