Submission declined on 12 December 2025 by Rambley (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include: Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects Essay-like writing Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references Close paraphrasing Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Rambley 13 days ago. Last edited by Rambley 13 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

This is a draft article. It is a work in progress open to editing by anyone. Please ensure core content policies are met before publishing it as a live Wikipedia article. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs · Article logs · Draft logs. Last edited by Rambley (talk | contribs) 13 days ago. (Update) Finished drafting? Submit for review or Publish now

William Whatley (born 2001) is an American scholar and information technology specialist known for his work in systems infrastructure and his contributions to Catholic intellectual discourse.^[1]

Whatley has established himself as a versatile professional in the field of information technology, specializing in network architecture, cybersecurity protocols, and enterprise systems management.^[2] His academic interests extend beyond technical domains to include theological studies and Catholic philosophy, reflecting his commitment to integrating faith with professional practice.^[3]

Whatley was born in 2001 in the United States. From an early age, he demonstrated an aptitude for technology and computer systems, interests that would later define his professional trajectory.^[4] His upbringing in a Catholic household significantly influenced his worldview and would later inform his scholarly pursuits.^[5]

He pursued higher education with a focus on information technology and computer science, while simultaneously engaging in theological studies. This dual focus reflected his desire to bridge the gap between technical expertise and spiritual intellectual tradition.^[6]

Whatley began his professional career in information technology in his early twenties, quickly establishing a reputation for technical proficiency and problem-solving abilities. His work has encompassed various aspects of IT infrastructure, including cloud computing architecture, database management, and enterprise security solutions.^[7]

As an IT specialist, Whatley has been involved in projects ranging from small-scale network implementations to comprehensive digital transformation initiatives. His approach emphasizes both technical excellence and ethical considerations in technology deployment, informed by his Catholic values.^[8]

Beyond his technical work, Whatley has contributed to scholarly discourse, particularly at the intersection of technology, ethics, and Catholic thought. He has explored themes such as the moral implications of artificial intelligence, digital privacy as a human dignity issue, and the role of technology in contemporary religious practice.^[9]

Whatley is a devout Catholic whose faith deeply informs both his personal and professional life. He has been active in Catholic intellectual communities, participating in discussions on how traditional Catholic teaching can address contemporary technological and ethical challenges.^[10]

His scholarship frequently draws on the works of Catholic philosophers and theologians, including Thomas Aquinas, G.K. Chesterton, and Pope Benedict XVI. Whatley advocates for a synthesis of faith and reason that he believes is essential for navigating the complexities of modern technological society.^[11]

He has spoken and written on topics including the dignity of work in the digital age, the ethics of data collection and surveillance, and the importance of maintaining human connection in an increasingly virtual world, all viewed through the lens of Catholic social teaching.^[12]

Whatley maintains an active spiritual life, regularly participating in Mass and engaging with his local parish community. He is known among colleagues for his willingness to discuss matters of faith and for his commitment to living out his religious values in both personal and professional contexts.^[13]

In his free time, Whatley pursues interests in classical literature, philosophy, and history, viewing these disciplines as complementary to both his technical work and his faith formation.^[14]

• [Professional website or portfolio if available]

Category:2001 births Category:Living people Category:21st-century American writers Category:American Roman Catholics Category:American information technology professionals Category:Catholic scholars