Submission declined on 25 December 2025 by MCE89 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by MCE89 21 hours ago. Last edited by MCE89 21 hours ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 23 December 2025 by ChrysGalley (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include: Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects Essay-like writing Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references Close paraphrasing Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models. Declined by ChrysGalley 2 days ago.

• Comment: "intersection" is an LLM buzz word when no roads are involved.
  More generally this article does not demonstrate notability under WP:GNG / WP:BASIC. It is not what the subject says or writes, it is what others say or write about the subject. ChrysGalley (talk) 17:33, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

Paul Stephen Armstrong (born 24 June 1981) is a London-based advisor, author,^[1] media commentator^[2] and speaker.^[3] He is the founder of TBD Group^[4] (originally HERE/FORTH) and advises global organisations on technologies including AI, nanotechnology,^[5] AR/VR, neural interfaces^[6] and 3D printing.^[7] In his early career Armstrong worked at MySpace^[8] in Los Angeles. He returned to the UK and led social technologies at WPP's Mindshare.^[9] Back in 2008 he founded the Twitter feed @themediaisdying^[10] and wrote about the so-called downward spiral of traditional media.^[11]

In 2017, Armstrong wrote Disruptive Technologies^[12]: Understand, Evaluate, Respond,^[13] published by Kogan Page, which was updated in 2023 to cover artificial intelligence, Web 3.0 and the Metaverse.

As a columnist and contributor his writing has appeared in Forbes^[7], Standard,^[14] Guardian,^[15] Cool Hunting,^[16] and he has a current column in City AM.^[17]

In 2020 Armstrong featured as a speaker in The Truth About Amazon, a documentary about Amazon presented by Helen Skelton and Sabrina Grant, broadcast on Channel 4.^[18]

A frequent media commentator, his comments have appeared in the Financial Times,.^[19] Wall Street Journal,^[20] BBC,^[21] Sky News,^[22] CNN, The Times,^[23] Fast Company^[24] IT Pro^[6]