Draft:96M
 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 8 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,714 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 14 August 2025 by Asilvering (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 12 August 2025 by Jlwoodwa (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Jlwoodwa 47 days ago. | |
96M
[edit]96M is an online gambling platform that operates in Malaysia and Singapore. The company offers a range of betting and gaming products, including online slots, live casino games, sports betting, e-sports betting, fishing games, and lottery. It is licensed in Curaçao and partners with various third-party game developers and service providers.
History
[edit]96M was established in the mid-2010s, targeting the Southeast Asian online gambling market[1]. Initially focused on Malaysia and Singapore, the platform expanded its offerings to include mobile-compatible versions and native applications for Android and iOS devices.
Operations
[edit]The platform provides access to several categories of gambling products:
- Online slots — Titles from providers such as Pragmatic Play, Spadegaming, and Mega888.
- Live casino games — Offerings include baccarat, blackjack, roulette, and sic bo, with live dealers from studios such as Evolution Gaming and SA Gaming.
- Sports betting — Markets for football, basketball, tennis, and other sports, with options for live in-play wagering.
- E-sports betting — Wagers on competitive video games such as Dota 2, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, and League of Legends.
- Fishing games, lottery, and fast games — Designed for casual play and accessible across multiple device types.
96M is accessible via desktop browsers, mobile browsers, and dedicated Android and iOS applications.
Licensing and Regulation
[edit]96M operates under a gaming license issued by the Government of Curaçao[2]. The platform states that it uses SSL encryption[3] to protect user data and offers two-factor authentication for account security. Games are provided by third-party developers whose products are audited for fairness by independent testing agencies.
Reputation
[edit]Player reviews of 96M are mixed. On Trustpilot Singapore, the platform has received an average rating above 4 out of 5, with positive feedback noting fast withdrawal times and ease of use. Some users have expressed concerns about game outcomes and losing streaks.
Responsible Gambling
[edit]96M publishes responsible gambling guidelines on its website and provides links to support resources. In Singapore, the platform references the National Council on Problem Gambling (NCPG)[4]. In Malaysia, it lists contact information for third-party organizations offering assistance with problem gambling.
Sponsorships
[edit]2023
2024
- Jacky Wu (吳宗憲) – term not disclosed – Global Brand Ambassador
- Evolution Gaming[7] – term not disclosed – Exclusive Game Partner[8] (“Lightning Baccarat”)
- CMD Sports[9] – term not disclosed – Product Partnership[10] (exclusive sports-betting app)
References
[edit]- ^ Daily, Space Coast (2023-11-07). "Why Everyone Playing At 96M Online Casino Malaysia". Space Coast Daily. Retrieved 2025-08-14.
- ^ "The Curaçao Gaming Control Board". www.gamingcontrolcuracao.org. Retrieved 2025-08-12.
- ^ Angela (2023-09-25). "Behind the Scenes: The Technology Powering 96M Casino's Fair Play and Security". The European Business Review. Retrieved 2025-08-12.
- ^ "Home". Default. Retrieved 2025-08-14.
- ^ "Jacky Wu". Discogs. Retrieved 2025-08-15.
- ^ BHD, OKE Distributor SDN. "96M Appoints Jacky Wu as Its Brand Ambassador in Online Casino Singapore". Newsfile. Retrieved 2025-08-15.
- ^ "Evolution Gaming Live Casino Game Provider - Play Online". Stake. Retrieved 2025-08-15.
- ^ BHD, OKE Distributor SDN. "96M Partners with Evolution Gaming to Introduce Lightning Baccarat in Online Casino Singapore". Newsfile. Retrieved 2025-08-15.
- ^ "Robert Pires joins CMD368 as Brand Ambassador". 2020-12-23. Retrieved 2025-08-15.
- ^ BHD, OKE Distributor SDN. "96M Partners with CMD Sports to Launch Exclusive Sports Betting App In Singapore". Newsfile. Retrieved 2025-08-15.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.