Copyleaks

Copyleaks
Type of site
SaaS for AI Content and Plagiarism Detection
Founded2015
HeadquartersStamford, CT
Area servedWorldwide
Founder(s)Alon Yamin and Yehonatan Bitton
CEOAlon Yamin
IndustryEducation
URLcopyleaks.com
RegistrationYes

Copyleaks is a plagiarism detection platform that uses artificial intelligence (AI) to identify similar and identical content across various formats.[1][2]

Copyleaks was founded in 2015 by Alon Yamin and Yehonatan Bitton, software developers working with text analysis, AI, machine learning, and other cutting-edge technologies.[1][2][3]

Copyleaks' product suite is used by businesses, educational institutions, and individuals to identify potential plagiarism and AI-generated content in order to provide transparency around responsible AI adoption.[4][5][6]

In 2022, Copyleaks raised $7.75 million to expand its anti-plagiarism capabilities.[7]

Services

[edit]

Copyleaks offers a suite of tools for academic institutions, businesses, and individuals designed to detect plagiarism and content generated by artificial intelligence.[4][8][9][10] The service analyzes text by comparing it against a database and by using an AI model to comprehend semantic meaning and writing style.[11]

The AI detection tool is intended to identify text produced by large language models, including cases where text may be paraphrased to mask AI generation.[4][citation needed] It is also available as a Chrome extension to verify online content.[12]

The company also provides a specific tool, Codeleaks, for detecting AI-generated and plagiarized source code, which also identifies the original software license.[13][14][15]

Reception

[edit]

The accuracy and reliability of AI detection tools, including Copyleaks, have been subjects of academic study. In June 2023, a study published in the International Journal for Educational Integrity found that AI detection tools were often inaccurate and unreliable.[16] A separate analysis in the same journal of five AI content detection tools found that Copyleaks had the highest sensitivity (the proportion of AI-generated content correctly identified) at 93% for content generated by GPT-4, but struggled with texts that had been modified by humans.[17][18]

A November 2023 analysis by a research team from the University of Adelaide found Copyleaks to be a reliable tool. In one test, the researchers wrote a film critique in the style of a 14-year-old student; Copyleaks determined an 85.2% probability of AI-generated content. After the text was altered by a human, the tool returned a 73.1% probability.[19][20]

Copyleaks has stated its AI detector has a 99% accuracy rate with a 0.2% false positive rate.[12][21][22][23]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b "Profile of a Founder: Alon Yamin of Copyleaks". Tech Tribune. 17 March 2020. Retrieved 1 May 2024.
  2. ^ a b "Enhancing Academic Integrity Guardrails with AI Detection". Bloomberg. 15 March 2024. Retrieved 1 May 2024.
  3. ^ Deborah, Balshem. "Copyleaks mulls potential Series B for AI-generated content detection". Mergermarket. Retrieved 1 May 2024.
  4. ^ a b c "Open LMS Partners With Copyleaks, Adding Advanced AI-Driven Plagiarism and AI Content Detection". eSchool News. 8 June 2023. Retrieved 1 May 2024.
  5. ^ "Artificial intelligence: Will it soon take the place of plagiarism?". District Administration. 3 April 2024. Retrieved 1 May 2024.
  6. ^ "AI Governance: Using AI Responsibly In Marketing". Leader Generation Podcast. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
  7. ^ Tiffany & Steven, Hsu & Myers (May 18, 2023). "Another Side of the A.I. Boom: Detecting What A.I. Makes". The New York Times. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
  8. ^ "Open LMS Partners with AI Detector to Combat Plagiarism". Campus Technology. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
  9. ^ "60% GPT-3.5 Outputs Plagiarised, Raises Copyright Concerns: Study". Business World. Retrieved 4 May 2024.
  10. ^ Kornick, Lindsay (3 January 2024). "AI platform CEO talks new tech detecting plagiarism following Harvard scandal: 'As prevalent as ever'". Fox News. Retrieved 2 May 2024.
  11. ^ Bray, Hiawatha. "Plagiarism accusations are everywhere. Here's how detection software works". The Boston Globe. Retrieved 5 May 2024.
  12. ^ a b Abdullahi, Aminu. "12 Best AI Detectors for 2024". Retrieved 4 May 2024.
  13. ^ Shankland, Stephen. "ChatGPT: A GPT-4 Turbo Upgrade and Everything Else to Know". CNET. Retrieved 12 May 2024.
  14. ^ Gutierrez, Daniel (March 2024). "Generative AI Report – 3/1/2024". insideBIGDATA. Retrieved 12 May 2024.
  15. ^ Lucariello, Kate. "Moodle Partners with Copyleaks to Detect AI Content, Interspersed Human/AI Content, and Plagiarism". Campus Technology. Retrieved 15 May 2024.
  16. ^ Weber-Wulff, Anohina-Naumeca, Bjelobaba, Foltýnek, Guerrero-Dib, Popoola, Šigut, Waddington (21 June 2023). "Testing of Detection Tools for AI-Generated Text". International Journal for Educational Integrity. 19 (1): 26. arXiv:2306.15666. doi:10.1007/s40979-023-00146-z.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  17. ^ Elkhatat, Elsaid & Almeer (1 September 2023). "Evaluating the efficacy of AI content detection tools in differentiating between human and AI-generated text". International Journal for Educational Integrity. 19 (17). doi:10.1007/s40979-023-00140-5. hdl:10576/58688.
  18. ^ Gewirtz, David. "Can AI detectors save us from ChatGPT? I tried 5 online tools to find out". ZDNET. Retrieved 20 May 2024.
  19. ^ Lee & Palmer (17 November 2023). "How hard can it be? Testing the dependability of AI detection tools". Times Higher Education. Retrieved 18 May 2024.
  20. ^ Coffey, Lauren. "Professors Cautious of Tools to Detect AI-Generated Writing". Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved 18 May 2024.
  21. ^ Pileiro, Frank (6 February 2024). "Educator Edtech Review: Copyleaks AI Content Detector". Tech & Learning. Retrieved 8 May 2024.
  22. ^ Johnson, Arianna. "New Tool Can Tell If Something Is AI-Written With 99% Accuracy". Forbes. Retrieved 8 May 2024.
  23. ^ Simone, Stephanie (10 November 2023). "Copyleaks offers a plagiarism detection platform, an AI-generated source code detector". KMWorld. Retrieved 9 May 2024.
[edit]